Author Topic: Nuclear bomb threat?  (Read 15327 times)

Because we really want to be known for nuking other countries, do we? Nuclear retaliation would make us just as bad.

It'd most likely stop the war.
Remember WW2?

How the forget do any of you know what'd happen if North Korea attacked us?

Because we really want to be known for nuking other countries, do we? Nuclear retaliation would make us just as bad.
No it wouldn't, god you're handicapped. The country nuking us would be the ones looking bad, retaliation looks like oh I don't know, defending your loving country.

It'd most likely stop the war.
Remember WW2?
Nuking someone to start a war is not the same as nuking someone to finish it. Also keep in mind that these bombs are probably 10x as powerful as Fat Man and Little Boy. Besides, nuclear defenses have been much improved since WW2, when they didn't exist.
No it wouldn't, god you're handicapped. The country nuking us would be the ones looking bad, retaliation looks like oh I don't know, defending your loving country.
You'd still be using a bomb that levels cities in an instant and kills many innocents.
« Last Edit: December 16, 2010, 07:04:53 PM by Tingalz »

they sighed a treaty in the Korean war didn't they?

Besides, nuclear defenses have been much improved since WW2, when they didn't exist.
lol.

You'd still be using a bomb that levels cities in an instant and kills many innocents.

True, but when they try to kill our citizens it's best to show them what it's like to kill their citizens.

You'd still be using a bomb that levels cities in an instant and kills many innocents.
So if a country invades your country and kills millions it isn't alright to go to their country and do the same thing? You're supposed to just try to negotiate with a country that destroyed millions of lives?

So if a country invades your country and kills millions it isn't alright to go to their country and do the same thing? You're supposed to just try to negotiate with a country that destroyed millions of lives?
It's still wrong. You no longer look like a victim when that happens.

So now you're saying your the country on the receiving end is just supposed to sit around and look like the victim and just not doing anything? That is literally the stupid thing I have heard all day. No one is going to frown upon you standing up for your self. An eye for an eye.

So if a country invades your country and kills millions it isn't alright to go to their country and do the same thing? You're supposed to just try to negotiate with a country that destroyed millions of lives?
"Look Korea, the families are pretty mad. We have 5 million dead. We'd just like you guys to stop doing stuff like this. Alright? Love yoooooou."

It's still wrong. You no longer look like a victim when that happens.

But what your enemy did was wrong too, and they are going to be in a worse position for being the attacker.

Some true political scientist and tactical military strategist up in this thread.

Some true political scientist and tactical military strategist up in this thread.

Are you talking about yourself, me or is it sarcasm about Tingalz?

Not really about anyone in particular, just a general indirect statement.