I've created several topics in the past expressing my discontent with the SS community. However, with the recent implementations of their moderation team, I'm reinsituting this argument with far more strength.
About an hour ago, the follow conversation occured:
Take what you want from the argument; as far as I'm concerned, there is absolutely no right or wrong presented, but simply a constant issue reevaluating itself. To some(presumably the SS moderation/administration team), that issue would be me. To others, that may be the construction of their policy; regardless of what your opinion is on the subject, the following still applies:
A moderator, or any form of governing figure being present in an SS server is very rare, ultimately allowing for direct chaos to unfold within their servers. That chaos consisting of things that completely disregard their policy, and otherwise disrupt several members of the server. Regardless of these many occurances, I'm a primary target. As far as I'm concerned, the attack revolves around the issue of my promotion in argument against their policy. However, instead of referring to the many people who are causing severe disruption, they refer to the person who simply doesn't agree with how they view that disruption. I'd love to see this justified, but I can't, for, every time I try to argue this point, I'm repeated to the scenerio of their disliking, and nothing more. Whenever I've finally broken the chain of "repeating the same thing over and over again will show you!" I find myself in the position of being ignored. Now, because this still isn't very clear to KINEX, I'll make sure it's very large, and in bold text:
Argument is an impossible factor to evade; any form of opinion expressing discontent with an opposing opinion is an argumentOn a side note, I apologize to the moderators who I may have harmed in the process of attacking their authority directly.
To conclude, I will GLADLY listen to anyone who promotes an opposition, I simply expect proper justification to follow.
