He's proclaiming his art solution and style superior because it doesn't have smooth color transitions that a quick and easy tool offers.
I find it relatively odd that you're nitpicking through my statements, trying to find "factual proclamations," when you wrote this message:
It isn't cheating and nowhere near it. Chose a better word or phrase next time.
According to you, it is, without any objections, NOT cheating. Regardless of future quotes you decide to throw out, your original statement was directly stating that I was incorrect, and now you're trying to say that my reply to that is the object proclaiming superiority over other opinions? That's seems odd.
Let me lay out a little time map for you:
1. I stated "I don't like to cheat"; using the term "cheat" was my perception of how the tool is used, simply implying that I think it allows a user to use too much digital programming to their advantage. I'm completely aware of the fact that others disagree, and I never implied that my view on it was the superior.
2. You then reply with the quote shown above, which, once again, simply states for me to choose a better word because you think that it is, without any objection, not cheating.
3. I reply stating that your PERCEPTION OF HOW IT'S USED shouldn't dictate what all should abide by, which, again, is represented by you telling me, not asking, to "choose a better word next time."
4. You reply with:
I never should of bothered questioning your so thought facts and my delusions.
This was a direct reply to:
In reference to traditional work, I consider it to be too much digital-based leverage.
Sorry if you're offended by it, but how you percieve something isn't fact, kiddo.
This is where I think you were confused. I never stated what I saw as "cheating" was fact, I was referring DIRECTLY to your statement represented in the section marked 2, which you proclaimed as being an absolute.
Hypocrisy isn't something you should avoid at such a large rate.
