wikpedioa s a li!!!11!

[TMAN7676]

I loving hate it when people say its "Not right" or "Its a lie"
Its written by the community, and thats why they think its not accurate.
I have no problem for people not to use it, but to just say its a lie just because its from the community irritates me.
Experts predicted that 2012 was going to happen, and the community proved them wrong.

It might not be as accurate as other websites, but that doesn't mean its a lie, either.

[Ad Bot]

[StarDust]

Dramatica is worse

[Nymethus]

If you're under my house I suppose these people you talk to are not too far away.

Have them come over to I can discuss this matter with them.

[Qwepir]

Experts said that 2012 was going to happen, and the community proved them wrong.

Any "expert" that says 2012 is the end of the world (which I think is what you mean) doesn't deserve that title.

[DrenDran]

Any "expert" that says 2012 is the end of the world (which I think is what you mean) doesn't deserve that title.

Yeah, wtf is OP talking about?

[Specever]

All my teachers say it lies.

[Nymethus]

How come I never hear of this stuff?


I don't suppose you all live in America?

[Tom]

Any "expert" that says 2012 is the end of the world (which I think is what you mean) doesn't deserve that title.

I'm pretty sure the experts are actually saying "The mayans predicted that 2012 is the end of the world."

But it is possaible that thier might be creditable people that believe 2012 is the end.

[Nymethus]

I'm pretty sure the experts are actually saying "The mayans predicted that 2012 is the end of the world."

But it is possaible that thier might be creditable people that believe 2012 is the end.

and that might be like 0.00000000000001% of all "experts"

[Kike]

I'm pretty sure the experts are actually saying "The mayans predicted that 2012 is the end of the world."

But it is possaible that thier might be creditable people that believe 2012 is the end.

Or the Mayans got sum forgetin' coffee instead of continuing the god damn calendar.

[Tom]

and that might be like 0.00000000000001% of all "experts"

You are probably right. My point is that if an expert has enough proof to support it, he or she should not be discredited.

[kevin 51l]

"You guys shouldn't use WikiPedia because anyone can edit it."

Yeah? Well apparently I also shouldn't go on some random site I get while searching, because that site could be untrustworthy, completely wrong, or just loving stupid. Really, if anyone can edit WikiPedia, that anyone can make a troll site that offers completely false information, or contain malware. So next time you hear your teacher say that, reply to them with "But anyone can make a false website."

[The Corporation]

"You guys shouldn't use WikiPedia because anyone can edit it."

Yeah? Well apparently I also shouldn't go on some random site I get while searching, because that site could be untrustworthy, completely wrong, or just loving stupid. Really, if anyone can edit WikiPedia, that anyone can make a troll site that offers completely false information, or contain malware. So next time you hear your teacher say that, reply to them with "But anyone can make a false website."

Not anyone can edit it.
There are certain articles which have security tags on them, allowing certain users to edit them.

[Malestrom]

Dramatica is worse

[Qwepir]

If you guys go to ED for factual education then you're a loving idiot.