Your opinion on abortions - Pro Life or Pro Choice?

[MillCzarr]

I believe in the Catholic faith, but not stuff like this

You can't be Catholic, and be Pro-Choice, its an oxymoron.

[Ad Bot]

[Dodger]

Also, I don't think the government should pay entirely for consensual pregnancy abortions, regardless of the woman's financial situation, since the father and medical should naturally be obliged to pay for it.

Also, welfare should be restricted in certain ways.

(Oh God I'm turning Conservative help me nooooooooooo)

[*Magick* Mage]

Women should not be allowed to have an abortion UNLESS if she was raped for instance or she has a serious medical condition OR cannot financially support the child. However, if the women is completely able to have the and willingly had loveual intercourse than she should not be allowed.

I agree for the most part, except on the bolded point.

A child can be supported on a low income, and should the matter come where it is economically implausible to care for a child, adoption is always the better route. Money shouldn't decide whether or not a person be born.

[keonesan]

You can't be Catholic, and be Pro-Choice, its an oxymoron.

That's loving stupid. I'm Christian (somewhat) and I couldn't give two stuffs if someone was gay. Believing in a religion doesn't mean we have to follow the loving book to the word. If god gave us free choice then use it.

[Kevdude]

You can't be Catholic, and be Pro-Choice, its an oxymoron.

So what form of Christianity do you recommend for me?

Quick, let's mutilate their snakees to prove that!

They still can live without that useless piece of skin, can't they?

That's loving stupid. I'm Christian (somewhat) and I couldn't give two stuffs if someone was gay. Believing in a religion doesn't mean we have to follow the loving book to the word. If god gave us free choice then use it.

Yeah, forget red necks

[DrenDran]

That's loving stupid. I'm Christian (somewhat) and I couldn't give two stuffs if someone was gay. Believing in a religion doesn't mean we have to follow the loving book to the word. If god gave us free choice then use it.

If you're catholic you follow the pope.
That's the point of catholism.
Idk about other sects though.

They still can live without that useless piece of skin, can't they?

It has some use.
But seriously, in that case parents should me able to cut any part of their child with that reason.

[keonesan]

I agree for the most part, except on the bolded point.

A child can be supported on a low income, and should the matter come where it is economically implausible to care for a child, adoption is always the better route. Money shouldn't decide whether or not a person be born.

Hmm I see.

I actually agree with that.

[steve5451]

The government gave us freedom!!1

[*Magick* Mage]

The government gave us freedom!!1

o.o

[Dodger]

The government gave us freedom!!1

forget Liberals.

[MillCzarr]

That's loving stupid. I'm Christian (somewhat) and I couldn't give two stuffs if someone was gay. Believing in a religion doesn't mean we have to follow the loving book to the word. If god gave us free choice then use it.

Don't consider yourself Christian, if you do all this stuff, that Christianity disapproves of.

[Kevdude]

Don't consider yourself Catholic, if you do all this stuff, that Catholicism disapproves of.

What form of Christianity do you think is good for someone who accepts gays and abortion?

[MillCzarr]

So what form of Christianity do you recommend for me?

I'm not telling you to go to any religion. I was just pointing something out.

[Raeyok]

I think this is the most amount of pages in which I've seen a non-religion topic go from non-religious to religious.

[Jacob/Lee]

Wow. 7 pages in 2 hours.