What you're saying doesn't make sense, evolution has nothing do with how life started
1. Change over time; history of nature; any sequence of events in nature.2. Changes in the frequencies of alleles in the gene pool of a population.3. Limited common descent: the idea that particular groups of organisms have descended froma common ancestor.4. The mechanisms responsible for the change required to produce limited descent withmodification; chiefly natural selection acting on random variations or mutations.5. Universal common descent: the idea that all organisms have descended from a singlecommon ancestor.6. Blind watchmaker thesis: the idea that all organisms have descended from commonancestors through unguided, unintelligent, purposeless, material processes such as naturalselection acting on random variations or mutations; the idea that the Darwinian mechanismof natural selection acting on random variation, and other similarly naturalistic mechanisms,completely suffice to explain the origin of novel biological forms and the appearance ofdesign in complex organisms.
CopypastaWhich one are you referring to?
None of those say how life started
o: Woaaahhh, long topic is long.
Its not a surprise since you made it centered around a controversial subject.
There is nothing controversial about evolution
In itself, maybe not.But when mentioned on a public forum with known idiots who don't realize that science is fact and religion is wrong if it disputes science, possibly.
