Author Topic: The Zeitgeist Movement  (Read 10968 times)

What?

are you loving serious?

Okay, I know you're a loving joke, get the forget out of here, there's no way you read every single thing that man had to debunk about Addendum.

Everything you say now is null and void, I refuse to listen to whatever you say now.
Jamming your fingers in your ears, closing your eyes, and screaming does not make your opinion valid, and it certainly doesn't make you "awesome" like you were going on about last page.

Wait a moment please - what just happened. Something was skipped over. :o

I did and I'm wandering if you read it.
Amade, what did you mean by this? I don't understand what you were trying to say.

Jamming your fingers in your ears, closing your eyes, and screaming does not make your opinion valid, and it certainly doesn't make you "awesome" like you were going on about last page.

Stop talking about yourself like that, it lowers self esteem. I told you to read what that man had to say, but no of course not you close-minded ignorant prick.

Stop talking about yourself like that, it lowers self esteem. I told you to read what that man had to say, but no of course not you close-minded ignorant prick.
Just remember, I'm the one in the corner.

Amade, what did you mean by this? I don't understand what you were trying to say.
I mean that most of the arguments on the site are weak at best, a lot of them complaints about something being mistermed and an overwhelming amount of complaining about the source of various quotations, and some criticism regarding how the Zeitgeist movement went about doing things.

You are, I give you proof and you take one look at it and disregard it, what am I going to have to do to prove to you? the evidence is clearly right in front of your face the man on the website cites sources, unlike Zeitgeist and Addendum. Like I said in the beginning I can go all day. Every time you try to bring some argument you're shot down.

I mean that most of the arguments on the site are weak at best, a lot of them complaints about something being mistermed and an overwhelming amount of complaining about the source of various quotations, and some criticism regarding how the Zeitgeist movement went about doing things.
Did you read through the site? Its a lot of information. I just really finished (And I've been reading since several minutes after Rek posted the site :P) the first part, and his arguments don't seem that invalid. And while he does comment on sourcing and whatnot, that is a major part of backing up theories such as these. :s

You are, I give you proof and you take one look at it and disregard it, what am I going to have to do to prove to you? the evidence is clearly right in front of your face the man on the website cites sources, unlike Zeitgeist and Addendum. Like I said in the beginning I can go all day. Every time you try to bring some argument you're shot down.
I gave you the sources for Zeitgeist and Addendum, are you in denial or do you refuse to admit that you were wrong?

Did you read through the site? Its a lot of information. I just really finished (And I've been reading since several minutes after Rek posted the site :P) the first part, and his arguments don't seem that invalid. And while he does comment on sourcing and whatnot, that is a major part of backing up theories such as these. :s
I didn't read the sections that quote Addendum or areas where the author repeated himself. Again, I have already provided the citations for the first and second Zeitgeist films.

I gave you the sources for Zeitgeist and Addendum, are you in denial or do you refuse to admit that you were wrong?
I didn't read the sections that quote Addendum or areas where the author repeated himself. Again, I have already provided the citations for the first and second Zeitgeist films.

You don't need to give me sources, I've watched both movies, I said this clearly a few pages back. You are the one in denial. You're the one refusing to read any of this website.