Poll

Do you want to see news coverage of Charlie Sheen?

Yes.
14 (34.1%)
No.
27 (65.9%)

Total Members Voted: 41

Author Topic: Charlie Sheen  (Read 1857 times)

Charlie Sheen acts like an ass on TV and is a detriment to nobody other than himself.

Glenn Beck acts like an ass on TV and is a detriment to millions of people.

whats wrong with drugs and woman? he had this reputation long BEFORE he was the highest paid person on tv.

then he comments stuff about how he dont give a stuff. and he earns even more on his next seasons contract lol.
im proud of him :D

Charlie Sheen acts like an ass on TV and is a detriment to nobody other than himself.

Glenn Beck acts like an ass on TV and is a detriment to millions of people.
Lets compare the two.

Glenn BeckCharlie Sheen
Obnoxious?YesYes
starfish?YesYes
Affects People?YesNo
Relevent?YesNo

Watching Glenn Beck is like watching Charlie Sheen. The only difference is, Glenn Beck actually has a tangible mental affect on millions of people in the United States. Charlie Sheen is a clown people watch for no apparent loving reason.

It makes perfect sense to watch Glenn Beck. The only people that watch Charlie Sheen are braindead forgettards, such as yourself.

i liked him in hot shots 1 and deux

Lets compare the two.

Glenn BeckCharlie Sheen
Obnoxious?YesYes
starfish?YesYes
Affects People?YesNo
Relevent?YesNo

Watching Glenn Beck is like watching Charlie Sheen. The only difference is, Glenn Beck actually has a tangible mental affect on millions of people in the United States. Charlie Sheen is a clown people watch for no apparent loving reason.

It makes perfect sense to watch Glenn Beck. The only people that watch Charlie Sheen are braindead forgettards, such as yourself.
Glenn Beck affects people negatively though

i liked him in hot shots 1 and deux



ferris bueller's day off is a great loving movie lol



ferris bueller's day off is a great loving movie lol
My friend Adam keeps asking me if I've seen that film. I'll have to watch it sometime.

God, he didn't age well at all.


He is the Britney Spears of the Sheen family.

Watching Glenn Beck is like watching Charlie Sheen. The only difference is, Glenn Beck actually has a tangible mental affect on millions of people in the United States. Charlie Sheen is a clown people watch for no apparent loving reason.

It makes perfect sense to watch Glenn Beck. The only people that watch Charlie Sheen are braindead forgettards, such as yourself.

So AIDS is better than cooties because AIDS has a tangible effect on people?

Charlie Sheen is making an ass of himself and all that's coming from it is him looking like an ass. Glenn Beck does the same thing, but what comes of it is the millions of morons that watch him believe his bullstuff. He's actively misleading millions of people in a very negative-to-society kind of way. Charlie Sheen is getting brief media attention, and is ruining what's left of his career, boo-loving-hoo. I frankly don't care for either of them. Both of them are forgettards.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2011, 04:35:56 PM by dkamm65 »

So AIDS is better than cooties because AIDS has a tangible effect on people?
This is probably the only indication that I need to see that you're a moron.

I can't fix stupid.

Edit: And before you throw the "MY ARGUMENT IS JUST TOO ADVANCED FOR YOU TO UNDERSTAND AND I WIN BY DEFAULT BECAUSE YOU'RE DISMISSIVE LOL" line at me, just consider this.

What if I was watching Discovery Health and they ran multiple segments a day about cooties? Doesn't that ruin their credibility?
AIDS kills people, cooties does not exist. Why would there be any coverage on cooties?

Just because something helps you take your mind off reality, doesn't mean that it deserves national coverage.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2011, 04:37:50 PM by Iban »

For an independent movie I'm doing an intervention parody with someone addicted to technology, the final joke will be a parody of Charlie Sheen interview.

This is probably the only indication that I need to see that you're a moron.

I can't fix stupid.

Edit: And before you throw the "MY ARGUMENT IS JUST TOO ADVANCED FOR YOU TO UNDERSTAND AND I WIN BY DEFAULT BECAUSE YOU'RE DISMISSIVE LOL" line at me, just consider this.

What if I was watching Discovery Health and they ran multiple segments a day about cooties? Doesn't that ruin their credibility?
AIDS kills people, cooties does not exist. Why would there be any coverage on cooties?

Just because something helps you take your mind off reality, doesn't mean that it deserves national coverage.

Missed point completely.

                       Tangible Effect           Negative Effect
Glenn Beck:            Yes                              Yes
Charlie Sheen         No                               No

AIDS                       Yes                              Yes
Cooties                   No                               No

Comprende?

Just cause Glenn Beck's effect is tangible, it does not mean it is a better effect to have around. Now shut the forget up.

so you guys are complaining on media