Platinum Blockland version 4.01

[DontCare4Free]

The controls (such as editing preferences) did not work, resizing forms, and drag and drop. These would happen on a daily basis.

I never got that problem. I have only used C# express and Pro editions though.

[Ad Bot]

[Legodude77]

I'll be backup then.

[Tyler66]

I never got that problem. I have only used C# express and Pro editions though.

Might just be my computer or a incompatible component.

[Killer2]

When can I start testing?

[Tyler66]

When can I start testing?

I am planning on testing on 3/15/11 - 3/18/11
So it will begin on 3/15/11

[DontCare4Free]

Might just be my computer or a incompatible component.

Probably, yes.

[BlockStar]

I am planning on testing on 3/15/11 - 3/18/11
So it will begin on 3/15/11

So that goes for vista to?

[Tyler66]

So that goes for vista to?

Yes, all the operating systems listed in OP. If they have atleast 1 tester.

[Killer2]

What the forget are those server operating systems anyways, I never heard of them at all.

[Tyler66]

What the forget are those server operating systems anyways, I never heard of them at all.

Server editions of the initial version:

Windows 95 - Windows NT 4 Server
Windows 2000 - Windows 2000 Server/DataCenter Server/Advanced Server
Windows XP - Windows 2003 Server
Windows Vista - Windows 2008 Server
Windows 7 - Windows 2008 R2 Server

Windows 2003 Server
Windows 2008 Server
Windows 2008 Server R2

[Bauklotz]

We dont have a beta testing "slot" for Ubuntu, sorry.

If you don't even beta-test for Ubuntu, why the hell do you beta-test for Windows then? Duh.
Ubuntu > Windows > Macintosh.

[RFW2]

Should have 64 bit and 32 bit testing.

[DontCare4Free]

Should have 64 bit and 32 bit testing.

True, since he is using P/Invoke.

Windows NT 4 - Windows NT 4 Server

Fixed.
Windows 95/98/ME didn't have server counterparts since they were targeted to consumers without servers, while businesses and other people with servers were supposed to use NT/2000. While NT and 9x (+ME) were compatible they were actually different operating systems with different kernels. With XP+ these two product lines were merged (or rather, 9x was discontinued and they made a consumer edition of their NT product line). However, 95/98 but not ME were actually shipped with a lite version of IIS called PWS (personal web server).

[keesfani]

Aren't you Tyland6?

[Tyler66]

Should have 64 bit and 32 bit testing.

I did have thoughts of testing the bits. Although I just wanted to test the different environments instead.

Fixed.
Windows 95/98/ME didn't have server counterparts since they were targeted to consumers without servers, while businesses and other people with servers were supposed to use NT/2000. While NT and 9x (+ME) were compatible they were actually different operating systems with different kernels. With XP+ these two product lines were merged (or rather, 9x was discontinued and they made a consumer edition of their NT product line). However, 95/98 but not ME were actually shipped with a lite version of IIS called PWS (personal web server).

True, since he is using P/Invoke.
Fixed.
Windows 95/98/ME didn't have server counterparts since they were targeted to consumers without servers, while businesses and other people with servers were supposed to use NT/2000. While NT and 9x (+ME) were compatible they were actually different operating systems with different kernels. With XP+ these two product lines were merged (or rather, 9x was discontinued and they made a consumer edition of their NT product line). However, 95/98 but not ME were actually shipped with a lite version of IIS called PWS (personal web server).

Too bad ME was short shelf lived operating system.

If you don't even beta-test for Ubuntu, why the hell do you beta-test for Windows then? Duh.
Ubuntu > Windows > Macintosh.

I have not studied Ubuntu much. Please don't confuse me like that.

Aren't you Tyland6?

Nope.