Author Topic: Cars. (V2)  (Read 77217 times)

You don't know how a car handles until you've driven it. I've driven an Escalade and a Licoln Mark LT, they handle better than anything I've ever driven before.
But you did not drive a super chief nor a silverado.
you don't know how it feels like to drive any of these

why are you talking about them being superior in the first place
Cybertails seems like a pretty big friend. Also to understand cars you have to drive them, stop being such a friend
except I didn't just randomly derail a thread, friend
too bad all three loving suck.
proof please
Doesn't exactly matter what it was between? I still replied to it. If you don't like it, ignore it, but don't tell me to get out.
as in out of the argument
but k

But you did not drive a super chief nor a silverado.
you don't know how it feels like to drive any of these

why are you talking about them being superior in the first place

Because the Ford Super Duty, which the Super Chief is based off of, is modeled after the Ford F-150, which I've driven before.

It handles like god.

Because the Ford Super Duty, which the Super Chief is based off of
is modeled after the Ford F-150, which I've driven before.
except the super chief, based off of another car, modeled after your car, CAN handle like stuff

it's veeery likely, given today's downhill-going

I drove a Saab 93.


...and thats it :(

it's veeery likely, given today's downhill-going

You are so loving stupid it hurts to read your posts.

proof please
I don't loving need any.
They are all gas-guzzling hulks.

Go loving drive a car before you start spouting stuff you know nothing about.


I don't loving need any.
They are all gas-guzzling hulks.

Go loving drive a car before you start spouting stuff you know nothing about.

You do realize that the Ford Super Chief has a V10 engine and can run 500 miles on hydrogen, and gets 27mpg on gasoline?

You do realize that the Ford Super Chief has a V10 engine and can run 500 miles on hydrogen, and gets 27mpg on gasoline?
that is still terrible mileage.

that is still terrible mileage.

It's a loving V10 engine, V8s get about 12-13mpg on average and this forgeter gets 27.

Okay, what do you drive?

Okay, what do you drive?
1995 Nissan Maxima
i never said its mileage was good.
i still get 16mpg maybe.

It's a loving V10 engine, V8s get about 12-13mpg on average and this forgeter gets 27.
even so, look at the Prius.
it gets around, if not above, 40mpg on average.

« Last Edit: November 10, 2011, 11:16:58 PM by Cybertails1998 »


1995 Nissan Maxima
i never said its mileage was good.
i still get 16mpg maybe.

If you call 27mpg a gas-guzzler then you're loving handicapped.

nice ad-hominem you have there

strike 2

I've proved the Hummer has worse fuel economy, lower horsepower, an uglier interior, a fugly exterior, and the fact that its no longer in production speaks to its failure. If the Escalade and the Super Chief are better than the Hummer in every single way, than by logical extension, they're better than the Hummer.

You're a loving moron fat piece of stuff that needs to learn to read.

If you call 27mpg a gas-guzzler then you're loving handicapped.
27mpg is terrible mileage.
Deal with it and lern2fueleconomy