Author Topic: The Rec. Drug Thread - FAQ, Q&A, and general information.  (Read 383819 times)

From what I've read of the thread thus far, you came in with metaphorical guns blazing and just insulted first the thread itself, then anyone who replied to your initial insults.
If someone takes maybe an hour of an evening where they happen to have nothing to do, to use a non-addictive drug, usually they'll be completly fine for whatever they must do the next day, therefore drug use won't make responsible people any more useless.

Let's look at your points you've brought up shall we?

  • Marijuana facilitates higher thought and aids in philosophical development.

FALSE: There isn't a single respected philosophy that was conjured as a result of marijuana abuse.

  • Marijuana stimulates creativity.

FALSE: Not a single major piece of artwork or literature was inspired by marijuana.

  • Hemp provides a clean alternative to polyester.

INCONSEQUENTIAL: Polyester and the like will not be replaced for a long time, and if it's ever replaced, it will be by something cheaper.

  • Marijuana abuse has no real consequences.

FALSE: http://www.drugabuse.gov/infofacts/marijuana.html , the only rebuttal to this is that there's a big conspiracy theory where the American government doesn't allow us to use harmless drugs even though it would be beneficial to the economy.


I tried it, personally I didn't like the expirence all that much, because well, I appreciate my ability to think, but I don't want it to stay illegal.
I don't try to say it has 'benifits', however even the 'harmful effects' listed on that website don't seem terriable, I mean, the government could still make money by legalizing it, and like I just said, people can be responsible with it.

I knew a drug dealer once! :D

Taboo and Stocking need to leave this thread, they're killing the mood.

Why doesn't Badspot made a "Thread-Ban" feature so we can keep troll's out of threads. (Guess what, thought of that while high, this is for you stocking!)
why can't you just not make stupid threads. and what "mood."

I knew a drug dealer once! :D
Q: What's the difference between a black guy who gives out drugs and a white guy who gives out drugs?
A: One's a druggie and the other's a pharmasist.

Q: What's the difference between a black guy who gives out drugs and a white guy who gives out drugs?
A: One's a druggie and the other's a pharmasist.
and they can both be taken advantage of. :cookieMonster:

why can't you just not make stupid threads. and what "mood."

Haha, you're dumb, I didn't make the thread. Also, Marijuana is supposed to keep people happy and open-minded, but when people come in and start spewing their bigotry it kills the mood.

Q: What's the difference between a black guy who gives out drugs and a white guy who gives out drugs?
A: One's a druggie and the other's a pharmasist.
O u.

But I did know a drug dealer. Several, actually. Most of them have stopped selling, though. :o



Hey look at this paragraph responding to it that you completely ignored:

-snip-

Also, from what I could tell from Meeses, pot inspires more abstract higher thinking about slightly lesser debated subjects and problems. There is barely any negative consequences to outweigh the many mental and physical benefits of Marijuana.
« Last Edit: June 09, 2011, 10:48:26 PM by Dodger »

Hey look at this paragraph responding to it that you completely ignored:

He's challenging my evidence with flawed logic; he's not contradicting me at all.

He's challenging my evidence with flawed logic; he's not contradicting me at all.
Who is?
I didn't even challange your 'evidence', I just said it should be legal regardless.

Who is?
I didn't even challange your 'evidence', I just said it should be legal regardless.

I think she was talking about Meeses paragraph that I linked in my post.

I think she he was talking about Meeses paragraph that I linked in my post.

I think she was talking about Meeses paragraph that I linked in my post.
Messes not meeses. I think they're actually two different people.