Author Topic: The Rec. Drug Thread - FAQ, Q&A, and general information.  (Read 384633 times)

Well, triple blew that argument out of the bongwater
which argument.

ITT: people fighting the power


which argument.

how narko was like "stop ignoring my posts and say something about the side effects" kinda thing

then he brown townyzed and broke down every single one, which is all true.

how narko was like "stop ignoring my posts and say something about the side effects" kinda thing

then he brown townyzed and broke down every single one, which is all true.
ah, i thought you meant an argument was blown out of the water three times.

ah, i thought you meant an argument was blown out of the water three times.

ahh lolol

-snip-

As I have said before, some consequences are indirect. First, a lot of your disapprovals include that there is a 'good' way and a 'bad' way. If so, why do so many people do it the 'bad' way? You would think they'd learn and think about it. Right?

Second, doing it for dizziness is flat-out stupid, I have no idea why anyone would want that feeling.

Third, you mention reasons why you shouldn't do it in the first place. Once again, people do it anyway.

Fourth, you admit to it being addictive. Why is the main reason why it's a problem.

As I have said before, some consequences are indirect. First, a lot of your disapprovals include that there is a 'good' way and a 'bad' way. If so, why do so many people do it the 'bad' way? You would think they'd learn and think about it. Right?

Second, doing it for dizziness is flat-out stupid, I have no idea why anyone would want that feeling.

Third, you mention reasons why you shouldn't do it in the first place. Once again, people do it anyway.

Fourth, you admit to it being addictive. Why is the main reason why it's a problem.

Where did he admit that it was addictive?

You need to chill and smoke a fatty joint, then you'll understand.

As I have said before, some consequences are indirect. First, a lot of your disapprovals include that there is a 'good' way and a 'bad' way. If so, why do so many people do it the 'bad' way? You would think they'd learn and think about it. Right?

Second, doing it for dizziness is flat-out stupid, I have no idea why anyone would want that feeling.

Third, you mention reasons why you shouldn't do it in the first place. Once again, people do it anyway.

Fourth, you admit to it being addictive. Why is the main reason why it's a problem.
there is no good or bad way to do weed. there is only reasons not to do it (such as low blood pressure.)

As I have said before, some consequences are indirect. First, a lot of your disapprovals include that there is a 'good' way and a 'bad' way. If so, why do so many people do it the 'bad' way? You would think they'd learn and think about it. Right?

Second, doing it for dizziness is flat-out stupid, I have no idea why anyone would want that feeling.

Third, you mention reasons why you shouldn't do it in the first place. Once again, people do it anyway.

Fourth, you admit to it being addictive. Why is the main reason why it's a problem.
All of the consequences are indirect. If you get dizzy and fall off a building you didn't die because of cannabis, you died because of an unsafe condition.

I don't think you can possibly understand how fun it to feel like you're flying in circles when you lean back in your chair.

Alcohol is readily available yet you aren't supposed to drink it in certain conditions. For example, high blood pressure. Same thing with weed. It's about self control. Just because the drug is illegal doesn't make it's users dumber than the users of alcohol.

It's psychologically addictive. So is everything. It's not a strong argument because it's hard to become psychologically addicted to something. The mental reward for smoking cannabis is not nearly as powerful as the reward given by things known to cause psychological addiction.
« Last Edit: June 10, 2011, 12:49:04 AM by TripleNickels »

Oh, my mistake then.  :D

I'm against 'chemical drugs' but I think the organic's should be legal and taxed, provided it doesn't end up like cigarettes.
Funny thing, did you ever know that opium comes from a plant?
I hate to play the devils advocate, but just because it's a plant doesn't mean it's good.
Not saying weed is bad though.

You need to chill and smoke a fatty joint, then you'll understand.
Then I'd become addicted, and most likely become one of you. It's why one shouldn't start it in the first place.


Where did he admit that it was addictive?
The only even slightly real problem. Regardless, I've never heard of someone actually being psychologically addicted.

Also, the only facts druggies have posted so far is their own posts.

there is no good or bad way to do weed. there is only reasons not to do it (such as low blood pressure.)
He posted about not smoking it if you didn't want a bad effect.

All of the consequences are indirect. If you get dizzy and fall off a building you didn't die because of cannabis, you died because of an unsafe condition.

I don't think you can possibly understand how fun it to feel like you're flying in circles when you lean back in your chair.

Alcohol is readily available yet you aren't supposed to smoke it in certain conditions. For example, high blood pressure. Same thing with weed. It's about self control. Just because the drug is illegal doesn't make it's users dumber than the users of alcohol.

It's psychologically addictive. So is everything. It's not a strong argument because it's hard to become psychologically addicted to something. The mental reward for smoking cannabis is not nearly as powerful as the reward given by things known to cause psychological addiction.

Dizzyness makes me feel sick, I still don't get what you're talking about. And not everything is addictive in the way marijuana is. Self control is significantly harder once under something known for addictive properties.

TBH Stocking's last post seems shockingly true. You people are risking lawful punishment for a quick dose of fake happyness.

Marijuana in it self isn't chemically or physiologically addictive, it's up to the individual whether or not they become addicted to it. It's just like Junk-Food, it tastes damn good, but if you over-do it, you'll have the consequences to pay.

Also, stop playing the "I'm a perfect christian kid because I won't ever smoke pot, I'll never become addicted because I won't try it" routine, it gets old really fast. Are you even in High-school yet, or are you only backing your argument because your parents said Marijuana is bad.

Marijuana in it self isn't chemically or physiologically addictive, it's up to the individual whether or not they become addicted to it. It's just like Junk-Food, it tastes damn good, but if you over-do it, you'll have the consequences to pay.

Also, stop playing the "I'm a perfect christian kid because I won't ever smoke pot, I'll never become addicted because I won't try it" routine, it gets old really fast. Are you even in High-school yet, or are you only backing your argument because your parents said Marijuana is bad.
He's trolling. I don't see how you can't tell.

He's trolling. I don't see how you can't tell.

I know he's trolling, but I can't seem to stay away, it's like a damn sirens call.