The Rec. Drug Thread - FAQ, Q&A, and general information.

[Messes]

He's trolling. I don't see how you can't tell.

yeah, this was pretty stupid-

Then I'd become addicted, and most likely become one of you.

[Ad Bot]

[TripleNickels]

Then I'd become addicted, and most likely become one of you. It's why one shouldn't start it in the first place.

No, you wouldn't. Cannabis is not physically addictive and it's impossible to become psychologically addicted that quickly. You'd need to be a heavy user using it for coping to even be at risk for psychological addiction.

Also, the only facts druggies have posted so far is their own posts.

I do beg to differ, I quoted an article in my earlier post and looked up things on WebMD to disprove you.
http://www.webmd.com/hypertension-high-blood-pressure/features/alcohol-debate is the only one I still have open.

He posted about not smoking it if you didn't want a bad effect.

The argument isn't about the way of ingestion. You can get drunk off saturating a tampon in alcohol and inserting that into your vagina. Is that as safe as drinking it? No.

Dizzyness makes me feel sick, I still don't get what you're talking about.

It's not dizziness in the sense you spun around too much. It's dizziness in the sense that you feel like you're moving when you're not.

And not everything is addictive in the way marijuana is.

Actually, it is. Again, it's not chemically addictive. Everything is addictive in the way cannabis is.

Self control is significantly harder once under something known for addictive properties.

Cannabis is not known for having addictive properties.

TBH Stocking's last post seems shockingly true. You people are risking lawful punishment for a quick dose of fake happyness.

Actually, the lawful punishment in most areas is very little. In California, they take your weed if they're a cop that had a bad day. Most places a fine is the biggest it goes to unless you're selling. Also, the quick dose can last 4+ hours, and I don't consider that quick. I consider the high of nitrous oxide short, which is approximately 15-30 seconds per hit.

[Desolation]

Going to bed, see you guys tomorrow, I hope the argument is over by then. :(

[Narkro555]

http://www.webmd.com/hypertension-high-blood-pressure/features/alcohol-debate

That has nothing to do with Cannabis, that's about alcohol.

Also, you keep claiming it isn't addictive, and yet so many people begin overdosing. There's bound to be a mental connection if it can do that to a person.

It's not dizziness in the sense you spun around too much. It's dizziness in the sense that you feel like you're moving when you're not

I STILL fail to see how disorientation is entertaining.

And whether or not the punishment is severe, it's still illegal.

[TripleNickels]

That has nothing to do with Cannabis, that's about alcohol.

Yeah, I used it as a reference when comparing it to alcohol. I didn't just make up a random fact about alcohol.

Also, you keep claiming it isn't addictive, and yet so many people begin overdosing.

I legitimately laughed at this. It is impossible to overdose on cannabis. You can not physically smoke enough weed to die. You just can't do it. It's something like 400 pounds in 20 minutes. 1 ounce lasts most people a week.

I STILL fail to see how disorientation is entertaining.

It's just a cool feeling. I can't describe it, it's just a cool feeling.

And whether or not the punishment is severe, it's still illegal.

People drank alcohol illegally during prohibition. People do a lot of illegal things. It's irrelevant to the effects on your health and I'm not arguing ethics, since I find ethics repulsive.

[Stocking]

Stoner logic:

> Chemical dependency is the same thing as an addiction.

> Marijuana does not induce a chemical dependency.

> Therefore, Marijuana is not addictive.

[Jacob/Lee]

Fun fact: Somebody died from swallowing 2 whole tablespoons of pure caffeine. Moron.

[TripleNickels]

Stoner logic:

Chemical dependency is the same thing as an addiction.

Marijuana does not induce a chemical dependency.

Therefor, Marijuana is not addictive.

What the forget? Do you have my posts on a spam blocker or something? In almost every single post I mentioned how it is psychologically addictive.

[Ciam86]

Stoner logic:

> Chemical dependency is the same thing as an addiction.

> Marijuana does not induce a chemical dependency.

> Therefore, Marijuana is not addictive.

seems like some solid logic to me, anyway, me and friends have smoked, we have no need to smoke it later.
Just a relaxant, gotta qualm down.

[Jacob/Lee]

What the forget? Do you have my posts on a spam blocker or something? In almost every single post I mentioned how it is psychologically addictive.

Nope.avi

[Stocking]

What the forget? Do you have my posts on a spam blocker or something? In almost every single post I mentioned how it is psychologically addictive.

Except I'm talking about a psychological addiction, hurrrrrrrrrr.

And you're only proving my point.

[Sheezy]

Except I'm talking about a psychological addiction, hurrrrrrrrrr.

And you're only proving my point.

Ignore what he says, and say it's different, then say you're talking about what is exactly what he said.
Obvious troll is obvious.

[Narkro555]

I said nothing about dying. And 'cool feelings' are the most advertized part of doing drugs, of course.

It's irrelevant to the effects on your health and I'm not arguing ethics, since I find ethics repulsive.

In other words, you just proved that a common factor for your type is not caring about ethics. That's a pretty basic part of being a normal human being. Finding that repulsive further provides evidence towards your kind being stupid.

If you don't care about something as basic as that, I don't know why I'm even arguing with you.

[Katamari007]

So uh, are we not following Yuki's rules again?

[Dr.Block]

and I'm not arguing ethics, since I find ethics repulsive.

I know this has nothing to do with this thread or this argument but how the forget do you find ethics repulsive?