Sorry, typo. I meant "Get it or ignore it"
i suppose that makes it a bit less hypocritical, yet you did ask me twice what i meant.
You were following a fallacious argument, don't deny that.
my original ideas were as follows:
-you can't fight fire with fire
-annoying bronies and annoying anti-bronies arguing is as stupid as stupid atheists and stupid christians arguing
-if you have a choice, and you consciously choose the worst choice, you are no better than a beast that can't choose
those are my ideas, they are my arguments, they are only fallacious to those with a closed mind.