Isn't it weird that every planet in our galaxy is dead?

[asablief]

Congratulations, everyone above this line, you are an astronomical handicap and don't know what you're talking about.
Ike, we haven't even seen a fraction of the planets in our galaxy, how would you even know what they look like or if they do or dont have life. It looks like you're talking out of your ass here and posting on impulse.

nou i red the noospaper!

[Ad Bot]

[ultimamax]

I propose that we use portals to land on an inhabitable planet's moon and from there jump down. Of course, the second portal would be in an airlocked room with astronauts and their equipment, because all of it will just suck in like a vaccum there.
Now all we need is a portal gun.

Congratulations, everyone above this line, you are an astronomical handicap and don't know what you're talking about.
Ike, we haven't even seen a fraction of the planets in our galaxy, how would you even know what they look like or if they do or don't have life. I'm also not even going to address that whole thing about planets needing to have the right shape for an atmosphere.
"Just look, none of them sustain life, they have no atmosphere and only a handful of them have water."
We don't know if any of them sustain life, many of them, like Venus and the half of them that are gas giants have very thick atmospheres, and barely any have water.
It looks like you're talking out of your ass here and posting on impulse.

He meant our solar system.

[Funnelcakes]

I propose that we use portals to land on an inhabitable planet's moon and from there jump down. Of course, the second portal would be in an airlocked room with astronauts and their equipment, because all of it will just suck in like a vaccum there.
Now all we need is a portal gun.

All we need is obsidian and some flint&steel

[Tingalz]

He meant our solar system.

I know, read the other points. He's still wrong.

[Nickelob Ultra]

The fact that we're the only planet for light years that supports life is because life requires the right temperature and atmosphere to be sustained.

Every other planet is either too close or too far from their star, and is too hot or too cold.  There is a fraction of the planets in the galaxy that can sustain life.

You're an idiot.

[DracoSoul]

Congratulations, everyone above this line, you are an astronomical handicap

not me i have faith in god

[ultimamax]

I know, read the other points. He's still wrong.

Oh, good point.
I guess we can't just send rovers and stuff everywhere, due to environmental or atmospherical differences.

The fact that we're the only planet for light years that supports life is because life requires the right temperature and atmosphere to be sustained.

Every other planet is either too close or too far from their star, and is too hot or too cold.  There is a fraction of the planets in the galaxy that can sustain life.

You're an idiot.

Who is that referring to? Tingalz?
If you think about it, there could be a species that lives in very very hot conditions or very very cold conditions. But for now, we have to look at planets similar to ours because they'd probably have the most similarities with our race.

[blaman]

The fact that we're the only planet for light years that supports life is because life requires the right temperature and atmosphere to be sustained.

Every other planet is either too close or too far from their star, and is too hot or too cold.  There is a fraction of the planets in the galaxy that can sustain life.

You're an idiot.

Life on earth manages to sustain and thrive in the most extreme climates. It doesn't require some golden temperature or atmospheric combination.
We have hardly surveyed any planets to say that they are all too close or too far from their stars. Most of the planets we have surveyed are gas giants, because that's all we could really detect. A new line of telescopes are being deployed so that we can actually spot earth sized planets and make a valid argument for or against extra terrestrial life.

I would argue that you are an idiot.

That being said I believe there is a 100% chance of life being out there, in every shape and form. Statistically and logically speaking it makes perfect sense for the galaxy to be absolutely crawling with life. The fact we haven't spotted it yet is a moot point. The vastness of the galaxy and the universe itself is so incomprehensibly great that it would make sense we haven't spotted life just yet, and we probably won't for a while.

[Daedalus]

Congratulations, everyone above this line, you are an astronomical handicap and don't know what you're talking about.
Ike, we haven't even seen a fraction of the planets in our galaxy, how would you even know what they look like or if they do or dont have life. I'm also not even going to address that whole thing about planets needing to have the right shape for an atmosphere.
"Just look, none of them sustain life, they have no atmosphere and only a handful of them have water."
We don't know if any of them sustain life, many of them, like venus and the half of them that are gas giants have very thick atmospheres, and barely any have water.
It looks like you're talking out of your ass here and posting on impulse.

How am I an astronomical handicap?
I meant that the universe is finite, but it's so rapidly expanding that we can never see the end of it because our travel methods aren't fast enough. It's almost impossible not to have life somewhere else because it's so huge.

[brickybob]

Congratulations, everyone above this line, you are an astronomical handicap and don't know what you're talking about.
Ike, we haven't even seen a fraction of the planets in our galaxy, how would you even know what they look like or if they do or dont have life. I'm also not even going to address that whole thing about planets needing to have the right shape for an atmosphere.
"Just look, none of them sustain life, they have no atmosphere and only a handful of them have water."
We don't know if any of them sustain life, many of them, like venus and the half of them that are gas giants have very thick atmospheres, and barely any have water.
It looks like you're talking out of your ass here and posting on impulse.

I like how you call us all handicaps then only complain about Ike.

[Bladedsword]

In my honest opinion, There is life besides us. How much sense would it make if we were the only life forms? And what if those other planets have life, but underground or in the center of the planet? We havent been to enough planets to make any conclusions and any idiot that thinks were the only life forms think of this, How do we know that their arent living things in the center of the earth? What if earth its self is alive and we are like the cells to help it live? We are probably a little pebble compared to other living things like ants. Were not alone.

[DracoSoul]

How am I an astronomical handicap?
I meant that the universe is finite, but it's so rapidly expanding that we can never see the end of it because our travel methods aren't fast enough. It's almost impossible not to have life somewhere else because it's so huge.

If the universe is finite, what's after the end of it?

[Jacob/Lee]

Nobody seems to think about other kinds of life. Since life on earth is carbon-based, we, as humans, assume that every planet incapable of supporting carbon-based life is a lifeless husk. For all we know, there could be hundreds of planets with life based on a different element right next door.

[Man 2]

Just look, none of them sustain life, they have no atmosphere and only a handful of them have water.

Just dust and rocks.

Well what about Earth?

[Riot]

WHY WOULD ANYONE MAKE A STUPID ASSUMPTION SUCH AS THIS.

Well, except the predictable christians. This topic is false, and everyone agreeing amongst each other.
Science and the definition of Man is crying.