Author Topic: (OLD) Gunner - Stole K1lla4l1f's FalloutRP.  (Read 4564 times)

That caution was provoking unnecessary dramaagainst

As did Aeschylus. Yet, you are "on his side".

thanks for bumping this topic after 11 loving days you stupid ass.

This was just as unnecessary.

Double Post: Screwed up the first quote. Ignore that please.

So because I take his side, I'm a bandwaggoner?

Your argument is ridiculous.

So because I take his side, I'm a bandwaggoner?

Your argument is ridiculous.
you take my side because Im lovey

So because I take his side, I'm a bandwaggoner?

Your argument is ridiculous.

Props for completely avoiding my point.

You don't have a point.

You just accused me of bandwaggoning because I took Aeschylus' side.

Maybe I like Aeschylus. Maybe I don't like Caution.

For whatever reasons I sided with Aeschylus, they don't concern you.

You don't have a point.

You just accused me of bandwaggoning because I took Aeschylus' side.

Maybe I like Aeschylus. Maybe I don't like Caution.

For whatever reasons I sided with Aeschylus, they don't concern you.

I seriously do not think you have a brain.
I feel as if I'm wasting my time, so I'm just going to type this smaller than I should.

Aeschylus and Caution both provoked unnecessary drama. You took sides with Aeschylus because Caution did exactly that, yet you didn't side with Caution because Aeschylus provoked unnecessary drama.

If your reasons for siding with Aeschylus don't concern me, then Aeschylus' reasons for conflict against Caution do not concern you.

If you didn't understand anything I've stated here, please stop replying to me.

I'm not going to post out of nowhere this late in the thread yelling at Aeschylus about how he started unnecessary drama. Caution had literally just started, so that's a situation that I could actually enter and attempt to disband.

Which apparently worked, since it stopped.

I'm not going to post out of nowhere this late in the thread yelling at Aeschylus about how he started unnecessary drama.

Yet, you do it to Caution.

Bravo!
/clap

I would have done the same if it was the other way around.

I was actually around to intervene this time. That's the only reason I sided with Aeschylus.

I would have done the same if it was the other way around.

I was actually around to intervene this time. That's the only reason I sided with Aeschylus.

So because of a three day difference in the post, you decide to hop on a band-wagon against Caution? Really now?

Would you prefer I re-stir up a 3-day dead quarrel that's already been settled?

Would you prefer I re-stir up a 3-day dead quarrel that's already been settled?

No, I prefer that you break your fingers, so you no longer can make another meaningless, band-wagoning post for a few weeks.

No, I prefer that you break your fingers, so you no longer can make another meaningless, band-wagoning post for a few weeks.
Meaningless?
Caution stop. You're being equally a big of an starfish as him.
Unless you can't understand this sentence, the meaning of my post was to get the fight to stop.

Quote from: Rugged link=topic=157324.msg4024632#msg4024632
my post was to get the fight to stop.

Derp.

Way to completely contradict yourself.

You provoked an argument.

Not me you twit.

You insulted him.

Meaningless?

Either everything you said was meaningless, or you intentionally wanted to argue with him, hence, band-wagonnig with Aeschylus.