Author Topic: feep - THERE IS NO ESCAPE - Re:I just saw a 5 year old boy get run over.  (Read 23316 times)

Bolt I pretty much hate you.  You are honestly an starfish in the highest degree.  I can't  see people voluntarily talking to you, it just doesn't make sense.

He proved Feep was lying.

Nothing else do add to it.

I now want to personally go to Feep's house and kick his pants for doing this.

He proved Feep was lying.

Nothing else do add to it.

I now want to personally go to Feep's house and kick his pants for doing this.
No he hasn't?

I had an aunt who died in a horrible car accident that I think involved fire, and she never appeared on the news.

This is evidence, yet not solid proof. the media doesn't have to take every story.

No he hasn't?

I had an aunt who died in a horrible car accident that I think involved fire, and she never appeared on the news.

This is evidence, yet not solid proof. the media doesn't have to take every story.

did u even read wat boltster posted?

yeah and a group of 50 teenagers broke into our neighbors empty house and had a beer party until 3 in the morning when we finally called the police and had them make like 30 arrests

never appeared on the news

My friends mother drowned in front of her entire family and the media waited 3 weeks before publishing any stories.

The mother worked in charity and cancer research, and had 4 kids all under 15.

The father is also a world-renowned surgeon, so it's a fairly big deal.

He proved Feep was lying.

Nothing else do add to it.

I now want to personally go to Feep's house and kick his pants for doing this.
...by saying that a report can't be brought up at that time.  Solid proof there.

Bolt I pretty much hate you.  You are honestly an starfish in the highest degree.  I can't  see people voluntarily talking to you, it just doesn't make sense.
Same with Liquid.

maybe they arent reporting it because they dont want to have to be the baron of bad news.
Oh you.

There's a difference between holding something from the press and holding it from the public.

Using someone's name without their permission on television is against the law, but giving the name of people involved in an accident in response to a public query isn't.
http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/aboutus/obtainrtarecords.html


Ok, here's the wrap of it. I'm not 11 feep, that's a joke. I'm 17 (can be proven)

The RTA/Queensland department of transport cannot legally withhold that information from me. Less than a month ago we called up the NSW equivalent for a legal studies project about legal processes between the media and government agencies. They legally can't withhold information about incidents on roads. They can withhold names, car registrations and licenses, but not the fact that the accident happened, or where.

Why can't they withhold records? See: "The Queensland Right to Information Act 2009". In Australia, this is how the media gets their juice - requisitions under the freedom of information / right to information acts.

All the americans coming in and saying "this happened and it wasn't published"; you are in america. Your population is huge, our population is tiny. When even a minor road accident happens here, it always makes atleast a print journalism website - no matter what. It might not be on primetime TV, but it always makes a print website (local newspapers/newspaper websites always report on things like these)

Think about it from a media perspective. Less than a month ago two of the biggest prime time news programs (A current affair, today tonight) ran programs about both the state of our roads AND dangerous truck drivers. There has been a massive push in the media to crucify the government over both these issues. Moral of the story is that they would have a field-day with something like this, especially because it involves children.

Again, if feep wants to give me a more specific location (you could even PM me, I'm not going to spam it everywhere) I could directly verify or destroy his story. If not I'll call them again once I get home. If that turns up no results (preemptively expecting a "its too recent and wouldn't be documented" response), I'll call them again in a few days. If that turns up no results, we know the story is unequivocally complete bullstuff.

Other than that, I think it's just a case of feep biting off more than he can chew. You could argue that the story was pulled until the cows come home, but that's not legal or logical, and doesn't justify why there are NO public reports. This certainly wouldn't be the first time someone has lied about something like this for attention, but it's definitely one of the less believable ones.

Anyone who thinks I'm an starfish for pushing this, get over it. I lost a friend in a car crash last year (and there are records of that), and it actually does sicken me that he would lie about this. I wouldn't be pursuing this if I had the slightest inkling that he was telling the truth. I did my research before I posted the first time. I actually know what I'm talking about.

http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/aboutus/obtainrtarecords.html
".nsw.gov.au"



Anyone who thinks I'm an starfish for pushing this, get over it. I lost a friend in a car crash last year

do it for him bro! dead people need justice where justice cant be given, but fight the good fight anyways! lol

dur


I don't care for Bolt, but I agree with him on this.

I called, and the same thing happened to me. I will try again tomorrow morning or so.

I think he's making stuff up. I mean, has nobody noticed how fast his attitude changed the second people started investigating his story?

My theory is based on opinion, not fact, mind you. But in time, we'll see the truth.

/enddetectivespeech