The strawman fallacy is when you take an argument, devolve it, and then attack the devolved argument.
True and False. At the base, it is when you attempt to replace one argument with a weaker one (the straw man). In this case, you are replacing my argument that I am doing this because it is an interesting discussion with one in which I am doing this because I am some sort of internet gremlin who takes joy in the suffering of others.
You are intentionally going along with Tony's discussion to troll people. To get them mad because you guys aren't following the intended discussion. I'm saying you're trolling. Which you are. Therefore it's not a strawman fallacy.
Perhaps this may not have been made crystal clear but I loving DESPISE Tony. WHY in the everloving forget would I ever want to take his side to troll you people after I have explicitly said he should be banned for doing it. Your arguments aren't just unfounded, they're downright nonsensical.
Additionally:If this was true, you would be criticizing lord tony for deliberately diverting a thread's intended discussion. Instead, you're following it which means you're intentionally doing it to annoy us. Which is trolling.
And here comes the straw man again. I'm not doing it to antagonize you people. I'm doing it because it is a discussion that is relevant to my interests.
Seventh, I am done with you. You are so
astronomically stupid it just boggles the mind. I cannot name a single other person who tries so hard to look smart and fails so hard except possibly Iban. This is why intelligent debate with you is out of the question. You are too infuriatingly dumb.
