Author Topic: My complaint against Bobah (Complaint Generator)  (Read 11162 times)

Unless you're a newly hatched pod person you already know that it is often said that Bobah exists in a state of intellectual hibernation. But let me add that Bobah prizes wealth and celebrity over and above decent morals and sound judgment. It is worth noting at the outset that if they could speak, the birds, snakes, and other creatures who are our Earth brothers and Earth sisters would surely say that Bobah's followers are too lazy to criticize the obvious incongruities presented by Bobah and his forces. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that Bobah's expostulations are a house of mirrors. How are we to find the opening that leads to freedom? Bobah doesn't want you to know the answer to that question; he wants to ensure you don't offer a framework for discussion so that we can more quickly reach a consensus.

When we tease apart the associations necessary to Bobah's irascible ideologies, we see that Bobah has been trying to convince us that the purpose of life is self-gratification. That argument fails to take into account the reality that Bobah maintains control over his vassals using intense peer pressure, manipulation of their guilt feelings, attacks on their loveuality, and fear. This is not what I think; this is what I know. I additionally know that Bobah is so dirty that he transcends the normal definition of that word into a whole new meaning that also encompasses "feckless" and "disgraceful". No, scratch that. Let me instead make the much stronger claim that those of us who are still sane, those of us who still have a firm grip on reality, those of us who still avouch that just because you can do something does not mean it's okay to do it, have an obligation to do more than just observe what Bobah is doing from a safe distance. We have an obligation to face our problems realistically, get to the root of our problems, and be determined to solve them. We have an obligation to make an impartial and well-informed evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of his fairy tales. And we have an obligation to penetrate the sunny façade of his convictions with the sharpened stick of reality.

All kidding aside, I can undoubtedly suggest how Bobah ought to behave. Ultimately, however, the burden of acting with moral rectitude lies with Bobah himself. Okay, then, let's move onto the really good part of this letter, the part in which I get to tell you that he insists that elected national governments are not accountable to their own people. That lie is a transparent and strained effort to keep us from noticing that he's the secret player behind the present, libidinous political scene. Bobah must be brought out from behind the curtain before it's too late, before his trained seals terrorize our youngsters. Contrary to the Rousseauian ideal of the transparency of the general will to itself, he is driving me nuts. I can't take it anymore!

For Bobah's quasi-sanguinary plans to succeed, he needs to dumb down our society. An uninformed populace is easier to control and manipulate than an educated populace. Before you know it, schoolchildren will stop being required to learn the meanings of words like "pancreaticoduodenostomy" and "piezocrystallization". They will be incapable of comprehending that I can't make heads or tails of Bobah's dissertations. I mean, does he want to encourage a deadly acceptance of intolerance, or doesn't he? I guess what I really mean to say is that Bobah hates it when you say that his casus belli do not come without a price. He really hates it when you say that. Try saying it to him sometime if you have a thick skin and don't mind having him shriek insults at you.

Easy as it may seem to hammer out solutions on the anvil of discourse, it is far more difficult to mention a bit about sinful, mindless blusterers such as Bobah. As far back as I can remember, he has pitted scumbags against deadbeats and casuists against individuals. I do not find bromides that are neo-bloodthirsty, lascivious, and nefarious to be "funny". Maybe I lack a sense of humor, but maybe the most heinous cadgers you'll ever see have increasingly been creating new (and reinforcing existing) prejudices and misconceptions. Bobah has a lot to answer for in regard to that. Did you hear what he recently said about sectarianism? Never before has a disdainful muddleheaded-type so cleverly hidden in plain sight his intention to incite pogroms, purges, and other mayhem.

We find among narrow and uneducated minds the belief that the ideas of "freedom" and "academicism" are Siamese twins. This belief is due to a basic confusion that can be cleared up simply by stating that we must reach out to people with the message that Bobah's failure to begin the debate about his remonstrations is so brown-nosing that Bobah labels everything that conflicts with his way of thinking as self-pitying, aberrant propaganda. We must alert people of that. We must educate them. We must inspire them. And we must encourage them to enable adversaries to meet each other and establish direct personal bonds that contradict the stereotypes they rely upon to power their unbridled biases. He argues that I am fatuous for wanting to reveal the nature and activity of his cohorts and expose their inner contexts as well as their ultimate final aims. I should point out that this is almost the same argument that was made against Copernicus and Galileo almost half a millennium ago.

With all due respect, Bobah has never satisfactorily proved his assertion that he can make all of our problems go away merely by sprinkling some sort of magic, pink, pixie dust over everything that he considers pesky or mealymouthed. He has merely justified that assertion with the phrase, "Because I said so." He will accelerate our descent into the cesspool of Stalinism because he possesses a hatred that defies all logic and understanding, that cannot be quantified or reasoned away, and that savagely possesses arrogant New Age lunkheads with hotheaded and uncontrollable rage. Contrary to the impression that viperine buffoons offer "new," "innovative," and "advanced" ideas, there is little new in their hijinks.

If Bobah believes that violence and prejudice are funny, then it's obvious why he thinks that he's morally obligated to destroy our country from within. You know what? His barbs are geared toward the continuation of social stratification under the rubric of "tradition". Funny, that was the same term that Bobah's functionaries once used to dump effluent into creeks, lakes, streams, and rivers. Many people are worried that Bobah will let advanced weaponry fall into the hands of voluble, lousy euphuists in the immediate years ahead. I don't like to speculate on uncertain things, but I will say that idle hands are the devil's tools. That's why Bobah spends his leisure time devising ever more conscienceless ways to lower scholastic standards.

If we look beyond Bobah's delusions of grandeur, we see that I strive to be consistent in my arguments. I can't say that I'm 100% true to this, but Bobah's frequent vacillating leads me to believe that he is extremely sniveling. In fact, my handy-dandy Sniveling-O-Meter confirms that this is a prescribed thought vs. free inquiry issue, an anti-democracy vs. democracy issue, and yes, a police state vs. free society issue. What's my problem, then? Allow me to present it in the form of a question: Why is it that 99 times out of 100, the only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean by infinity is to contemplate the extent of Bobah's stupidity? The most appealing theory has to do with the way that Bobah justifies his manipulative rooster-and-bull stories with fallacious logical arguments based on argumentum ad baculum. In case you're unfamiliar with the term, it means that if we don't accept Bobah's claim that those of us who oppose him would rather run than fight then he will lead me down a path of pain and suffering. For future reference, unless you define success using the sort of loosey-goosey standards by which Bobah abides you'll realize that true measures of success involve avoiding the extremes of a pessimistic naturalism and an optimistic humanism by combining the truths of both. Success is getting the world to see that it is pointless to fret about the damage already caused by Bobah's pernicious endeavors. The past cannot be changed. We must cope with the present if we hope to affect our future and turn Bobah's whiney, sappy philippics to our advantage.

I've been rolling up my sleeves in preparation for a long, hard battle against blathering energumens. In that context, one could say that if Bobah wants to be taken seriously, he should counter the arguments in this letter with facts, not illogical panaceas, personal anecdotes, or insults. To give the devil his due, I was impressed with how efficiently he managed to supply the chains that bind the individual to notions of self-loathing and unworthiness, especially given that I'll tell you what we need to do about all the craziness he is mongering. We need to shape a world of dignity and harmony, a world of justice, solidarity, liberty, and prosperity. Anyway, that's it for this letter. Let Bobah read it and weep.

tl;dr : http://www.pakin.org/complaint/ Use it complain about people fun.
« Last Edit: July 16, 2011, 06:26:48 AM by Zet »



I disagee with this statement.


Mr. Zetic's worst transgressions are systematically whitewashed by the press. To counteract that whitewash I will use the remainder of my space here to expose Zetic for who he really is. What follows is a set of observations I have made about tendentious party animals. His protégés are not technically snippy slubberdegullions but rather crotchety skivers. I believe that there is a small—yet not entirely insignificant—difference. For better or for worse, he is on some sort of thesaurus-fueled rampage. Every sentence Zetic writes is filled with needlessly long words like "barothermohygrograph" and "roentgenographic". Either he is deliberately trying to confuse us or else he's secretly scheming to extend his fifteen minutes of fame to fifteen months.

The bulk of execrable, disruptive swaggerers are at least marginally tolerable but not Zetic. I feel this way because his ability to capitalize on the economic chaos, racial tensions, and social discontent of the current historical moment can be explained in large part by the following. If Zetic thinks his hariolations represent progress, he should rethink his definition of progress. In theory, no matter how much his precepts are rationalized, they still make empty promises. But in reality, if we let him shove us towards an absolute state of vassalage, then greed, corruption, and plagiarism will characterize the government. Oppressive measures will be directed against citizens. And lies and deceit will be the stock-in-trade of the media and educational institutions.

What is Zetic's current objective? As usual, there are multiple objectives:

-to handicap the free and natural economic development of various countries' indigenous population,
-to traffic in our blood, our birthright, and our security, and
-to feed blind hatred.

The world is full of people who make a big deal out of nothing. We don't need any more people like that. What we need are people who are willing to take the mechanisms, language, ideology, and phraseology for determining what is right and what is wrong out of the hands of Zetic and his partisans and put them back in the hands of ordinary people. We need people who understand that just because Zetic and his jackals don't like being labelled as "uncontrollable gasbags" or "profligate common blood-stained criminals" doesn't mean the shoe doesn't fit. Am I being too idealistic—a Pollyanna—when I suggest that all we need to do is do something good for others? I don't think so. Admittedly, Zetic's propositions are a parody of original thought, but his adherents have been seen transforming our little community into a global crucible of terror and gore. Zetic claimed he would take responsibility for this patronizing behavior, but in fact he did nothing to fix matters or punish the culprits. This proves that I think that Zetic's stances, while ideologically grounded in a rhetoric and practice of parasitism, are surrounded by a cloak of secrecy and "plausible denial". You probably think that too. But Zetic does not think that. Zetic thinks that the world's salvation comes from whims, irrationality, and delusions.
In general, Zetic exhibits a startling lack of remorse, shame, and guilt for so brazenly attempting to hinder economic growth and job creation. Sure, there are exceptions, but he accuses me of being impolite in my responses to his obstinate imprecations. Let's see: Zetic disgorges his disparaging and arrogant comments on a topic of which he is wholly ignorant, and he expects a polite reply? What is he, satanic? Let's all keep our fingers crossed that he doesn't gum up what were once great ideas. Wherever bumptious polemics are seen initiating a reign of morally questionable, lethargic terror, Zetic is there. Wherever ridiculous scofflaws are found producing a large number of totally disorganized extravagancies, most besotted indecencies, and, above all, the most fatuous blasphemies against everything that I hold most sacred and most dear, Zetic is lurking nearby. Wherever selfish, daffy derelicts are observed panicking irrationally and overreacting completely, Zetic will no doubt be in the vicinity. I defy any coincidence theorist to try to explain away those observations. Clearly, to someone whose eyes are open, Zetic's constantly repeated mantra that jingoism and Lysenkoism are identical concepts is an insanely dodgy notion. By way of contrast, consider my personal mantra that Zetic is obviously under the influence of LSD or some other hallucinogenic. Why else would he suspect that the majority of blasphemous, spleeny fomenters of revolution are heroes, if not saints?

To pick an obvious but often overlooked example, whenever Zetic announces that a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem, his cheerleaders applaud on cue and the accolades are long and ostentatious. What's funny is that they don't provide similar feedback whenever I tell them that it's easy for us to shake our heads at Zetic's foolishness and cowardice. It's easy for us to exclaim that we should rise to the challenge of thwarting Zetic's fork-tongued plans. It's easy for us to say, "Zetic's ramblings are made of the same spirit that accounts for the majority of the problems we face in this world." The point is that it's easy for us to say these things because some people have said that Zetic formulates his barbs in a precarious latticework between the self-absorbed and the muddleheaded. Maybe. But I'm more inclined to believe that those who have most injured and oppressed humanity, who have most deeply sinned against it, are, according to Zetic's standards and conscience, good people. Apparently, bad people are those who have noticed that Zetic has been known to "prove" statistically that he commands an army of robots that live in the hollow center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like shaking things up a bit on the surface. As you might have suspected, his proof is flawed. The primary problem with it is that it replaces a legitimate claim of association with an illegitimate claim of causality. Consequently, Zetic's "proof" demonstrates only that only insane bludgers ever assert that his offhand remarks are "grandly compelling", "articulate and persuasive", or "a vital contribution", so to speak.

On the other hand, Zetic's brown townects are a logical absurdity, a series of deductions from a premise that has been denied. Speaking of absurdities, you don't need to be a rocket scientist to detect the subtext of this letter. But just in case it's too subliminal for some, let me thrust it into your face right here: It's untoward for Zetic to grant a free ride to the undeserving. Or perhaps I should say, it's bloody-minded. Maybe some day, Zetic will finally stop trying to dismantle national civil rights organizations by driving a wedge between the leaders and the rank-and-file members. Don't hold your breath, though.

I recently informed Zetic that his encomiasts generate alienation and withdrawal. Zetic said he'd "look further into the matter." Well, not too much further. After all, the hour is late indeed. Fortunately, it's not yet too late to communicate and teach. His apologues are evil. They're evil because they cause global warming; they make your teeth fall out; they give you spots; they incite nuclear war. And, as if that weren't enough, we must improve the lot of humankind if we are ever to solve the problems that are important to most people. Yes, this is a bold, audacious, even unprecedented undertaking. Yes, it lacks any realistic guarantee of success. However, it is an undertaking that we must really pursue because our real enemies are not people living in a distant land whose names we don't know and whose culture we don't understand. Our real enemies are Zetic and all others who clear-cut ancient forest lands.

Unless lying is morally justifiable as long as it's referred to as "strategic deception", it is simply wrong to conclude that it's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the stubborn hands of refractory, randy lugs. Although ordinary men and women want to issue a call to conscience and reason, Zetic wants to turn positions of leadership into positions of complacency. This incongruity reveals that he believes that he is perched atop the moral high ground. If so, then maybe Zetic should climb down to scavenge for some facts before claiming that character development is not a matter of "strength through adversity" but rather, "entitlement through victimization".

I do not wish to evaluate antipluralism here, though I aver that Zetic wants to be the one who determines what information we have access to. Yet he is also a big proponent of a particularly purblind form of colonialism. Do you see something wrong with that picture? What I see is that if anything, the unalterable law of biology has a corollary that is generally overlooked. Specifically, Zetic will stop at nothing to scatter about in profusion an abundance of pro-Zetic invectives. This may sound outrageous, but if it were fiction I would have thought of something more credible. As it stands, sometime in the future Zetic will prey on people's fear of political and economic instability. Fortunately, that hasn't happened...yet. But it will undeniably happen if we don't fight scurrility and slander.

With an enormous expenditure of words, unclear in content and incomprehensible as to meaning, Zetic frequently stammers an endless hodgepodge of phrases purportedly as witty as in reality they are reprehensible. Only mutinous, pestiferous lamebrained-types can feel at home in this maze of reasoning and cull an "inner experience" from this dung heap of impolitic neopaganism. Even as I write those words I can feel Zetic cringe. That's okay. Cringe. I don't care because most of you reading this letter have your hearts in the right place. Now follow your hearts with actions. No one is more simple-minded than Mr. Zetic. Since I don't have anything more to say on that subject, I'll politely get off my soapbox now.

What the forget is going on?

How the fck did you type that so fast.



forget! I dont even know who you guys are!


What the forget is going on?
Shinji, I noticed major problems about you.

I need to get something out of the way before I begin. I must say that Mr. Shinji's jeremiads reflect an era in which cultures or attitudes different from one's own were dealt with through violence and mistrust. To organize my discussion, I suggest that we take one step back in the causal chain and build bridges where in the past all that existed were moats and drawbridges. Shinji's roorbacks are not our only concern. To state the matter in a few words, Shinji's editorials have merged with alarmism in several interesting ways. Both spring from the same kind of reality-denying mentality. Both produce culturally degenerate films and tapes. And both trample over the very freedoms and rights that he claims to support.

We mustn't be content to patch and darn, to piece and cobble at the worn and rotten fabric of Shinji's obtuse rejoinders. Instead we must rally good-hearted people to the side of our cause. If Shinji had even a shred of intellectual integrity, he'd admit that I'd like very much to respond to his claim that his peuplade is looking out for our interests. Unfortunately, taking into account Shinji's background, education, and intelligence, I am quite sure that Shinji would not be able to understand my response. Hence, let me say simply this: Shinji's fantasy is to eroticize relations of dominance and subordination. He dreams of a world that grants him such a freedom with no strings attached. Welcome to the world of vandalism! In that nightmare world it has long since been forgotten that Shinji has been trying to popularize the narrative that his opinions represent the opinions of the majority—or even a plurality. My fear is that if he's successful at promoting such roosteramamy notions then even the man on the Clapham omnibus may agree to let him prostrate the honor, power, independence, laws, and property of entire countries.

Unlike everyone else in the world, Shinji seriously believes that women are spare parts in the social repertoire—mere optional extras. Woo woooo! Here comes the clue train. Last stop: Shinji.

Rather than respond to my letters with reasoned arguments, Shinji prefers to provide effete conspiracies with the necessary asylum to take root and spread. Although this method of attack is unparalleled in any other sphere of literary controversy it does prove that Shinji is a bit teched. Stated differently, he should start developing the parts of his brain that have been impaired by masochism. At least then he'll stop trying to destroy that which is the envy of—and model for—the entire civilized world. He doesn't have any principles, or if he does, he puts them aside whenever they're inconvenient. Some will say I exaggerate, but actually I'm being quite lenient. I didn't mention, for example, that according to Shinji, his traducements are intelligent, commonsensical, and entirely consonant with the views of ordinary people. He might as well be reading tea leaves or tossing chicken bones on the floor for divination about what's true and what isn't. Maybe then Shinji would realize that we must work together to end his control over the minds and souls of countless people. What can you do to help? For starters, you might want to criticize the obvious incongruities presented by Shinji and his protégés. I personally derive great satisfaction in doing that sort of thing because Shinji cannot completely conceal his true animus and inspiration. If you find that fact distressing then you should help me advance a clear, credible, and effective vision for dealing with our present dilemma and its most frightful manifestations. Either that, or you can crawl into a corner and lament that you got yourself born in the wrong universe. Don't expect your sobbing to do much good, however, because Shinji truly believes that he can be trusted to judge the rest of the world from a unique perch of pure wisdom. I hope you realize that that's just a deranged pipe dream from a gutless pipe and that in the real world, by comparing today to even ten years ago and projecting the course we're on, I'd say we're in for an even more foul-mouthed, disloyal, and sniffish society, all thanks to Shinji's comments.

Although we can occasionally tie the retailers of contumelious new claims to older fabrications, there is unfortunately no shortage of new rumor. If you've never seen Shinji wiretap all of our telephones and computers, you're either incredibly unobservant or are concealing the truth from yourself. From the very beginning, the worst types of villainous, incorrigible peculators there are have labored to recruit into their ranks the sons and daughters of the powerful, famous, and rich. If you doubt this, just ask around.

Let me be clear. Shinji will probably respond to this letter just like he responds to all criticism. He will put me down as "avaricious" or "delirious". That's his standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about him except the most fawning praise. I want to give people more information about Shinji, help them digest and assimilate and understand that information, and help them draw responsible conclusions from it. Here's one conclusion I decidedly hope people draw: It's best to ignore most of the quotes that Shinji so frequently cites. He takes quotes out of context; uses misleading, irrelevant, and out-of-date quotes; and presents quotes from legitimate authorities used misleadingly to support contentions that they did not intend and that are not true. In short, either Shinji has no real conception of the sweep of history, or he is merely intent on winning some debating pin by trying to pierce a hole in my logic with "facts" that are taken out of context.

I sometimes ask myself whether the struggle to express my views is worth all of the potential consequences. And I consistently answer by saying that the intolerant, putrid sybarites that comprise Shinji's entourage are as thick as thieves. If one of them is willing to pooh-pooh the concerns of others, then they all are. What's more, none of them is able to accept that if you study Shinji's purblind communiqués long enough, you'll come to the inescapable conclusion that he finds reality too difficult to swallow. Or maybe it just gets lost between the sports and entertainment pages. In either case, Shinji's snotty blandishments can be quite educational. By studying them, students can observe firsthand the consequences of having a mind consumed with paranoia, fear, hatred, and ignorance.

If you read between the lines of Shinji's denunciations, you'll clearly find that Shinji believes that we can all live together happily without laws, like the members of some 1960s-style dope-smoking commune. Sorry, but I have to call foul on that one. He should learn to appreciate what he has instead of feeling so oppressed because he can't do everything he wants every time he wants to. Every time Shinji tries, he gets increasingly successful in his attempts to exert more and more control over other individuals. This dangerous trend means not only death for free thought but for imagination as well.

Shinji's every utterance drips with know-it-all condescension and sarcasm. Sad, but true. And it'll only get worse if Shinji finds a way to make the pot of metagrobolism overboil and scald the whole world. He is secretly planning to create an atmosphere that may temporarily energize or exhilarate but which, at the same time, will pose the gravest of human threats. I realize that that may sound rather conspiratorial and far-fetched to most people, which is why you need to understand that I, for one, have a scientist's respect for objective truth. That's why I'm telling you that Shinji uses the word "microcinematographic" to justify descending to character assassination and name calling. In doing so, he is reversing the meaning of that word as a means of disguising the fact that he claims to have read somewhere that once he has approved of something it can't possibly be audacious. I don't doubt that he has indeed read such a thing; one can find all sorts of crazy stuff on the Internet. More reliable sources, however, tend to agree that Shinji claims to have turned over a new leaf shortly after getting caught trying to sugarcoat the past and dispense false optimism for the future. This claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by Shinji's vicegerents. The truth is that if we let Shinji evoke a misdirected response to genuine unresolved grievances, then greed, corruption, and racialism will characterize the government. Oppressive measures will be directed against citizens. And lies and deceit will be the stock-in-trade of the media and educational institutions.

If we fail to call for proper disciplinary action against Shinji and his hangers-on then all of our sacrifices will be as forgotten as the sand blowing across Ozymandias's dead empire. The "decay of that colossal wreck," as the poet Shelley puts it, teaches us that I sometimes use the hypocorism, "arrogant, mean-spirited rabble-rousers", when referring to Shinji and his peons. The logical consequences of that are clear: Some of the facts I'm about to present may seem shocking. This they certainly are. However, one could make a strong argument that I am quite certain that Shinji's attempts to reduce our modern, civilized, industrialized society to a state of mindless, primitive barbarism are just a game to him. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that Shinji's expostulations are destructive. They're morally destructive, socially destructive—even intellectually destructive. And, as if that weren't enough, Shinji has, on a number of occasions, expressed a desire to diminish society's inducements to good behavior. On all of these occasions I submitted to the advice of my friends, who assured me that when people see censorious dolts behaving like censorious dolts they begin to realize that unenlightened killjoys understate the negative impact of factionalism. That said, we mustn't lose sight of who the real enemy is: Shinji and his bad-tempered accomplices. I am growing weary—and wary—of Mr. Shinji's homophobic outbursts. Period, finis, and Q.E.D.

It's the letter generator thing

Zet and Bobah are obviously the same person.

My brain hurts.
I havent read a thing because they havent included a TL;DR

Yeah it's a generator.

It's the letter generator thing
No, these are legit complaints these people have done.

No, these are legit complaints these people have done.
Bullstuff.