Author Topic: Group be makin Furries  (Read 11661 times)

Scientist 1: "Hmm, a tree and a shark. Let's see.

Scientist 2: "H-oh? Interesting..."

Scientist 3: "Wh-why, is this n-"

Scientists 2 & 1: "Shut up!"

Furcigarettes; fur friendry "WHY DO YOU GUYS HATE FURRIES???????????" furries: lol i keep my furry stuff to myself!I dont mean chopping someones fingers off because they stole a candy bar. Murders should be killed in cold blood. Bigger thefts, say a bank robbery, take a finger or two. Something like that.
late to respond to this, but forget it responding anyways
an eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind. public shaming is really just a loving stuffty way of punishment. the ideal punishment teaches someone why what they did was wrong and only punishes if they show no signs of being broken of it. if you kill a murderer right away, that does no good and potentially kills an innocent man. what if he's proven to be severely mentally disabled or it was proven that he didn't do it? you can't take back death


late to respond to this, but forget it responding anyways
an eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind. public shaming is really just a loving stuffty way of punishment. the ideal punishment teaches someone why what they did was wrong and only punishes if they show no signs of being broken of it. if you kill a murderer right away, that does no good and potentially kills an innocent man. what if he's proven to be severely mentally disabled or it was proven that he didn't do it? you can't take back death
i dont mean "look this guy COULD have commited the murder, BUT LETS SHOOT HIM ANYWAY" i mean "this guy commited this murder" and kill him. Actually you know what? how about putting them through both pain and imprisionment? yeah thatll work better.

i dont mean "look this guy COULD have commited the murder, BUT LETS SHOOT HIM ANYWAY" i mean "this guy commited this murder" and kill him. Actually you know what? how about putting them through both pain and imprisionment? yeah thatll work better.
the justice system makes mistakes. you can justify america all you want, but that is a fact. if you rehabilitate them or throw them in prison, a mistake can be undone rather easily. if you kill them, you can't undo that. you cut off a finger, you can't undo that. i'd rather have a murderer have the possibility of being released a changed man rather than just outright killing him.

the justice system makes mistakes. you can justify america all you want, but that is a fact. if you rehabilitate them or throw them in prison, a mistake can be undone rather easily. if you kill them, you can't undo that. you cut off a finger, you can't undo that. i'd rather have a murderer have the possibility of being released a changed man rather than just outright killing him.
you actually have some solid points there, i know the justice system makes mistakes as well. i still think that when we know for sure someone is guilty they should be tortured and imprisioned, set an example.

I'd rather let a hundred guilty men walk than one innocent die.

you actually have some solid points there, i know the justice system makes mistakes as well. i still think that when we know for sure someone is guilty they should be tortured and imprisioned, set an example.
torture? are you loving dense? i already explained that if they think the only bad thing about murder/robbery/etc is the possibility of being caught, they'll do it if they think they won't get caught. we should at least try to wean them away from that behavior instead of just outright punishing them.

torture? are you loving dense? i already explained that if they think the only bad thing about murder/robbery/etc is the possibility of being caught, they'll do it if they think they won't get caught. we should at least try to wean them away from that behavior instead of just outright punishing them.
like i said, you have your points, but that doesnt change my stance.

Scientist 1: "It's a miracle!!"
Scientist 2: "What?!"
Scientist 1: "I've finally made chickenmen!"
Scientist 2: "... That's not a miracle."
Scientist 3: "Hey-what the forget is that thing?!"
Scientist 1: "A chickenman."
Scientists 2 & 3: "Pretty damn useless."

Scientist 1: "It's a miracle!!"
Scientist 2: "What?!"
Scientist 1: "I've finally made chickenmen!"
Scientist 2: "... That's not a miracle."
Scientist 3: "Hey-what the forget is that thing?!"
Scientist 1: "A chickenman."
Scientists 2 & 3: "Pretty damn useless."
okay you can stop now

I'd rather let a hundred guilty men walk than one innocent die.
I wouldn't
I mean, I'm all for fair trial and justice and all that
but really
if I had to kill one random person who has done nothing wrong in order to prevent ten people who need to be jailed from being loose, I'd do it
because like
here

PersonA = One innocent man.
PeopleA = Ten innocent people.
PeopleB = Ten guilty people.

PersonA gets killed. > PeopleB jailed. > PeopleA are safe.
PersonA survives. > PeopleB run loose. > PeopleA are harmed by PeopleB.

like i said, you have your points, but that doesnt change my stance.
quit being so goddamn stubborn and learn that viewpoints can be changed. you don't have to blindly stick with your previous beliefs, you can be open to new ones.

I wouldn't
I mean, I'm all for fair trial and justice and all that
but really
if I had to kill one random person who has done nothing wrong in order to prevent ten people who need to be jailed from being loose, I'd do it
because like
here

PersonA = One innocent man.
PeopleA = Ten innocent people.
PeopleB = Ten guilty people.

PersonA gets killed. > PeopleB jailed. > PeopleA are safe.
PersonA survives. > PeopleB run loose. > PeopleA are harmed by PeopleB.
But if you kill an innocent, you're pretty much as bad as them. I also don't believe in punishment, so much as rehabilitation, so I could just be a hippy.

But if you kill an innocent, you're pretty much as bad as them. I also don't believe in punishment, so much as rehabilitation, so I could just be a hippy.
But that's just one life for the safety of ten others.