I hope you realize the entire loving war is against terrorists. Many other sucessful terrorist attacks have happened, maybe not on US soil, but they have happened in the middle east.
The middle east is the third loving world. The US is not going to change anything, it's just made it worse and incited attacks against itself. It's not the united states of america's BUSINESS if terrorists are loving around in the middle east. I realize there's a war and it's completely counter-productive, all it does it create terror, waste money and not solve any problems that really exist.
The navy is the armed forces. The navy isn't JUST boats.
It's space ships too, but we are currently out of stock.
If the US wern't in the middle east fighting terrorists, the entire middle east would be under control of terrorists. All oil trade to the U.S. from the middle east would halt, which would then raise gas prices and bring our economy down into the stuffter again. There is a reason we are there.
That's not true at all. The middle east can handle itself. It's also not like they'd be terrorists or against trade with the united states since you wouldn't have forgeted with them in the first place. You're right, though, it's an unstable situation and there's probably a need for people to be there. But comr4de's better than that, we can send some idiot thugs, and comrade isn't one of them.
But comr4de's better than that, we can send some idiot thugs, and comrade isn't one of them.
Comr4de is planning on joining the navy.
(It's not the concern of the navy, like, at all)
Guess what, as soon as you leave terrorists are going to occupy those two countries. It's a giant money sink and you'll never succeed at stabilizing the area.
That's not true at all. The middle east can handle itself. \
Hey look! you just contradicted yourself.
occupy != run
The middle east CAN handle itself, if you leave it'll be stable and not annoying. The government might be brutal dictators but it's better than what we're doing in there.
