Poll

Abortions?

Yes. A woman deserves the choice.
38 (56.7%)
No. A woman shouldn't be able to do that.
16 (23.9%)
Yes, only if you were raped.
13 (19.4%)

Total Members Voted: 67

Author Topic: Your Stance on Laws (Or punishment); Today's Topic: Abortions  (Read 22656 times)

Yeah, I'm handicapped for not wanting a murderer working with my employees.
if they're rehabilitated, then you are handicapped for not hiring them based on that.
One execution costs $20,000
One year of prison costs $15,000-$18,000 for one inmate.
Rehabilitating a prisoner costs $20,000

The cheapest answer to this situation is the death sentence.
it's not about the cheapest answer, it's about the right thing to do

the right thing to do
The right thing to do is not kill someone in the first place and get over your problems like a real man.

IRONY

No. Maybe someone with a brain will come along and I can have a decent chat with them.I stopped reading there. Learn to argue without directly saying "you're stupid"

But you just said you didn't understand. That makes you stupid. "someone with a brain" would understand regular text.

if a company can't prove that they refused to hire someone based on their actual credentials and not stuff like that, fine the company and fire the person who refused to hire them
whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
it seems here like companies have to prove that they're innocent to the government, rather than have the government have to prove that they're guilty
and then the company would have to waste their time and money for a bullstuff claim

t's about the right thing to do

the right thing to do isnt possible if it cant be afforded.
you cant think without a wallet. welcome to the real world.

One execution costs $20,000
One year of prison costs $15,000-$18,000 for one inmate.
Rehabilitating a prisoner costs $20,000+

The cheapest answer to this situation is the death sentence.
cheapest answer to sickness is to not treat people and let them die

But you just said you didn't understand. That makes you stupid. "someone with a brain" would understand regular text.
Once again you're going off and assuming things and calling me stupid. It wasn't regular text to me, it was garbage slapped together.

if they're rehabilitated, then you are handicapped for not hiring them based on that.
Rehabilitation means nothing. Something in the human brain made them cross the line and kill somebody, I wouldn't want to risk the person still being dangerous and working with my clean employees. It'd be like bringing a ticking timebomb in your place of business with all your friends and workers there.

whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
it seems here like companies have to prove that they're innocent to the government, rather than have the government have to prove that they're guilty
and then the company would have to waste their time and money for a bullstuff claim
companies in america don't exactly have a good track record at the moment, so
Rehabilitation means nothing. Something in the human brain made them cross the line and kill somebody, I wouldn't want to risk the person still being dangerous and working with my clean employees. It'd be like bringing a ticking timebomb in your place of business with all your friends and workers there.
except the thing in their brain that caused that has been dealt with. they're fine now. if they were legitimately mentally disabled, they wouldn't have been released.

Once again you're going off and assuming things and calling me stupid. It wasn't regular text to me, it was garbage slapped together.
But it wasn't. I'm on topic all the time while you keep pointing fingers at everyone, telling them how smart they are or what they're doing based how how well your argument is going instead of, say, facts.

Therapy is only worth the cost if the murderer gets released from prison. Even then, not a lot of people would be willing to hire him. However, if the criminal's family is willing to pay for it instead of the government, I am OKAY with it.

Also, as Qwepir said, the murderer probably killed a "productive member" of society who was probably more productive than the criminal will ever be.

The only reason Norway has less criminals is because they give the citizens a forget ton of welfare including the rehabilitation, and it's actually causing the nation to go broke.

cheapest answer to sickness is to not treat people and let them die

Except most good Americans pay for their medical insurance and doctors instead of letting the government pay for it.

Therapy is only worth the cost if the murderer gets released from prison. Even then, not a lot of people would be willing to hire him. However, if the criminal's family is willing to pay for it instead of the government, I am OKAY with it.

Also, as Qwepir said, the murderer probably killed a "productive member" of society who was probably more productive than the criminal will ever be.

The only reason Norway has less criminals is because they give the citizens a forget ton of welfare including the rehabilitation, and it's actually causing them to go broke.

Except most good Americans pay for their medical insurance and doctors instead of letting the government pay for it.
and america's government isn't broke right now?

companies in america don't exactly have a good track record at the moment
...

Except most good Americans pay for their medical insurance and doctors instead of letting the government pay for it.
yeah well who pays the roads

let the roads fall apart cause it's cheaper than fixing them

But it wasn't. I'm on topic all the time while you keep pointing fingers at everyone, telling them how smart they are or what they're doing based how how well your argument is going instead of, say, facts.
What?

Stop trying to tell me what i'm doing.