Science Discussion - Topic: Time Dilation

[Doomonkey]

Have fun living in the dark ages.

It's not conservation of mass, it's conservation of energy. No energy is destroyed in that reaction.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_mass

Have fun living in a land of fantasy.

I have no problem with the modern theories, I just get pissed off when they make things up because they can't currently find an explanation for things. "Dog is white" > "Dog must be ghost" > "Everything we once knew is forever changed"

[Ad Bot]

[Doomonkey]

You're a loving moron. Observation happens daily.

What has been observed that would say matter has disappeared?

[Oasis]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_mass

Have fun living in a land of fantasy.

I have no problem with the modern theories, I just get pissed off when they make things up because they can't currently find an explanation for things. "Dog is white" > "Dog must be ghost" > "Everything we once knew is forever changed"

Holy forget, I'm astounded at your blatant ignorance to the sciences. Get the forget out.

[Doomonkey]

Holy forget, I'm astounded at your blatant ignorance to the sciences. Get the forget out.

Nice job insulting people and providing no evidence. Just like your sciences.

[Wizzeh]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_mass

Have fun living in a land of fantasy.
The "closed system" involved is the entire universe. Conservation of mass is not violated because mass = energy.


I have no problem with the modern theories, I just get pissed off when they make things up because they can't currently find an explanation for things. "Dog is white" > "Dog must be ghost" > "Everything we once knew is forever changed"

You still have to test it lol, if you don't do that you're not doing science.

[Doomonkey]

It'd be really nice if they just had a diagram with pictures of what things are and what they're made of.

Mass = Energy, that's where the pictures come in to explain it to me.

[Wizzeh]

It'd be really nice if they just had a diagram with pictures of what things are and what they're made of.

EDIT: Anyway, that's not what modern science is like. Often it starts with an inference but that's valid as an observation, you can mathematically "test" a lot of this and physics (which I assume you're referring to) is working towards testing it experimentally, and you can test the bullstuff rules too, if any of them are proven false you've got to revise. It's still science.

In case you missed it. Obviously it'd be nice if that were the case but a lot of modern physics is too complicated to fit on a diagram.

[IkeTheGeneric]

>>Wizzeh is posting in the topic

This will not end well

[Doomonkey]

In case you missed it. Obviously it'd be nice if that were the case but a lot of modern physics is too complicated to fit on a diagram.

I did miss it.

But I don't see how it's hard to have a diagram that shows. Positron + Electron = 0 + Energy. This is how the electron and positron are turned into energy.

Perhaps I just don't like modern science because it's poorly explained. A lot of it does seem like conclusions from nowhere though.

[Wizzeh]

>>Wizzeh is posting in the topic

This will not end well

I'm here to discuss science, not argue.

I did miss it.

But I don't see how it's hard to have a diagram that shows. Positron + Electron = 0 + Energy. This is how the electron and positron are turned into energy.

Well I don't really know how it works and I'm not sure that anyone does but basically every particle has intrinsic energy and since energy can't be created or destroyed when the particle is destroyed it has to release energy.


EDIT: Having said that I realize, wouldn't the energies of the two particles nullify one another?

[Tingalz]

EDIT: Having said that I realize, wouldn't the energies of the two particles nullify one another?

it doesnt release energy and anti-energy or something like that, just energy

[LordCutlerBeckett]

Antienergy would be bad. :l

[Doomonkey]

Antienergy would be bad. :l

Antienergy comes into contact with regular energy, is nullified, and mass is released.

Except that wouldn't work because then the mass would contain no energy

[Wizzeh]

No, tingalz is right, you can't have antienergy because of the way mass-energy equivalance actually works.

[LordCutlerBeckett]

Yes, but antienergy would nullify any kind of normal energy. But that doesn't work, because antienergy doesn't exist, and will never exist. So I am going off topic.