Lol.
First off, you say HDR looks better than Anti Aliasing, implying that HDR is AMD-exclusive and Anti Aliasing is nVidias equivalent.
They both render totally differently. One is lighting and bloom, the other is re-rendering the edges of objects for a smoother look. Both manufacturers are capable of both.
Second, ATI is now AMD.
Third, PhysX isn't nVidia exclusive. AMD cards are capable, but nVidia are such starfishs that they make the performance really bad unless rendered on a nVidia card.
Fourth, Koopa, just because someone has a card that is lower than the HD4000 series, doesn't mean it's bad. For example, someone with a HD3870 is still going to be able to run quite a few games on max.
Right.
I personally swapped to AMD after having bad experiences with nVidia drivers, where in 2 separate cases they bunged the chips.
I also believe that when the Bulldozer series of CPUs, Llano etc, come out, we will experience really great performance boosts just like nVidia has been using Intel for, for the last few years, especially with the i7s.
I have a superclocked HD5850 with a custom cooler. Still runs all my games on max, but I am due for an upgrade.
Just for debate purposes, perhaps some of us should list some features unique to each manufacturer.
nVidia has 3d vision for 3d gaming/videos, surround vision for multi monitor setups (although this is only possible if you SLI cards or buy a very expensive GTX590), SLI of course (SLI, tri-SLI and sometimes quad-SLI).
AMD has a 3d setup in production now, and MOST of their lineup for the last few years are capable of Eyefinity, their multi monitor setup. No need for expensive dual GPU cards etc. Also, they have their Crossfire (up to 4 way), and Hybrid Crossfire (use your integrated GPU as well as your dedicated GPU for added performance).
People, please post and add to this list.
Poll