Cubelands, you have no idea.

[Wynd_Fox]

I'm sure if he wasn't deaf he wouldn't act so stupid. I kind of feel bad for him.

I disagree. I think he would type more intelligibly, but not have a different personality.

[Ad Bot]

[DrenDran]

And the request was stupid.

The request was fine.

Not only does the stupidty of Furling's posts not come only from his lack of grammar, even the grammar part, he acknolowges that he is bad at, and refuses to improve upon. Learning english for him is like learning a forign language for us. That said, if I went to a German forum, I'd loving be sure I was good at typing German. The same applies to him. He "should be" capiable of learning proper (or at least not hilarious stuffty) grammar.

[Mega-Bear]

I disagree. I think he would type more intelligibly, but not have a different personality.

His personality may have formed this way based around miscommunication.

Though yes, he'd still make the same choices in some situations.

[Stocking]

He "should be" capiable of learning proper (or at least not hilarious stuffty) grammar.

"Should be" should be italicized to emphasize it not quoted.

"Capiable" isn't a word

"Hilarious" is an adjective and cannot modify the adjective "stuffty", you need the adverb form "hilariously"

Hehehehe

[DrenDran]

"Should be" should be italicized to emphasize it not quoted.

"Capiable" isn't a word

"Hilarious" is an adjective and cannot modify the adjective "stuffty", you need the adverb form "hilariously"

Hehehehe

The entire point of that post was that I don't actually care about his Grammar.
So pointing grammar mistakes out doesn't actually imply hyprocracy.

[Alkatjo]

I don't get why he's so stupid though. I mean. I know he's Deaf. But still. He acts like he's the smartest person in the world.

[Wynd_Fox]

The request was fine.

It really, really wasn't, but that's not the point.

"Should be" should be italicized to emphasize it not quoted.

"Capiable" isn't a word

"Hilarious" is an adjective and cannot modify the adjective "stuffty", you need the adverb form "hilariously"

Hehehehe

You missed "forign," "acknolowges," and "english." The last being the least offensive, since it's just a capitalization error.

[Stocking]

You missed "forign," "acknolowges," and "english." The last being the least offensive, since it's just a capitalization error.

I just did the last sentence because I have hos to bang and drugs to smoke.

[|Shadow]

Nope.avi
you better forget lock this topic, and you are idiot.

lol'd so hard

[Mega-Bear]

lol'd so hard

I can elaborate on a "forget lock."

It's a lock but you have to forget the keyhole to open it.

:D

[Chrono]

Oh you made a topic about this?

Here's a PM I just sent to Alkatjo.

Topic in question: http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=165217.0

Problems with your posts:

Learn Grammar before you go saying stuff is impossible. Is client sided add-ons impossible, we thought it wasent untill we actually came out with hats, close in the beta.

1) You have grammatical errors while claiming someone else has bad grammar.
2) Grammar has nothing to do whether or not something is impossible. Either way, he's right. You cannot change someone else's name. If you could and someone made this add-on, it would cause major issues. Someone could join the server with either the name: Badspot0, or even Alkatjo0, and their name would appear as Badspot or Alkatjo. Auto kicking/banning someone based on their name is a terrible idea no matter what way you look at it so that's out of the question as well.
3) Client sided add-ons have nothing to do with this because it's a server sided add-on. Hats are also a server sided add-on, and I'm not even sure what "close in the beta" is supposed to mean.

Locked because furling/cubelands ruins everything and will most likely cause the end of the world thanks to his assumptions.

4) Not only is this post absolutely ridiculous, but also shows that you're way too sensitive about some lightweight comments on your topic on the internet. If you can't even handle that little amount of pressure, never make a topic again.

[Alkatjo]

Oh you made a topic about this?

Here's a PM I just sent to Alkatjo.
1) You have grammatical errors while claiming someone else has bad grammar.
2) Grammar has nothing to do whether or not something is impossible. Either way, he's right. You cannot change someone else's name. If you could and someone made this add-on, it would cause major issues. Someone could join the server with either the name: Badspot0, or even Alkatjo0, and their name would appear as Badspot or Alkatjo. Auto kicking/banning someone based on their name is a terrible idea no matter what way you look at it so that's out of the question as well.
3) Client sided add-ons have nothing to do with this because it's a server sided add-on. Hats are also a server sided add-on, and I'm not even sure what "close in the beta" is supposed to mean.
4) Not only is this post absolutely ridiculous, but also shows that you're way too sensitive about some lightweight comments on your topic on the internet. If you can't even handle that little amount of pressure, never make a topic again.
Chrono, you mistake me for someone who gives a stuff. I don't. Stay on topic or get out.

[Stocking]

Wow you're a friend dude.

[Wynd_Fox]

Wow. That was on topic. You just get worse and worse.

[Chrono]

Chrono, you mistake me for someone who gives a stuff. I don't. Stay on topic or get out.

Gee how wrong I was to think you could've been capable of reading what I write.