Poll

what you prefer to be?

Scientifically
Religion
Both

Author Topic: Closest Human Ancestor May Rewrite Steps in Our Evolution  (Read 5551 times)

Yes and we should live a sad depressing life in shame because of that.

somehow I knew this would turn in to a religious argument

Godwin is and had always been right.
And that is a name don't use it in your cigarettegy bad argumental defenses.

Also, an example, do you believe in unicorns?
No?
Why? Because their existance has not been proven.
But somehow a horse with a horn is less credible to exist then some omnipotent huge mind that controls everything and makes your life miserable.

idk my life has been pretty awesome so far

human science can't prove something that isn't physical

We proved Quantum Mechanics.
Your argument is invalid.

We proved Quantum Mechanics.
Your argument is invalid.
Atomic-level physics are called physics for a reason; they are physical. I know what you mean, but I think Kearn means science can't prove or disprove entities such as "God."

Atomic-level physics are called physics for a reason; they are physical. I know what you mean, but I think Kearn means science can't prove or disprove entities such as "God."
Why does humanity only speculate for god then?
Why doesn't everyone think there are huge ass spaceships that are invisible orbiting earth atm?
Because those don't give false ideas of safety?

Why does humanity only speculate for god then?
Why doesn't everyone think there are huge ass spaceships that are invisible orbiting earth atm?
Because those don't give false ideas of safety?
Probably because something on Earth would hit the invisible spaceships when we searched the stars.

Probably because something on Earth would hit the invisible spaceships when we searched the stars.
No they are uncollided too.
God is uncollided.
And god doesn't have science.
So science could easily outcollide god.

God doesn't exist, that's why you can't prove him.

And as for the evolution of bats:

>Mammals with skin flaps to slow falls
>Evolve the ability to glide for short distances
>Become less heavy allowing for longer gliding
>Develop more control
>Flight

is it that hard to not just "yeah whaeva" @ someone trying to start a "religious" argument?

God doesn't exist, that's why you can't prove him.

And as for the evolution of bats:

>Mammals with skin flaps to slow falls
>Evolve the ability to glide for short distances
>Become less heavy allowing for longer gliding
>Develop more control
>Flight

how to walk with half-wings

Have you ever heard of flying squirrels? They do fine.

Have you ever heard of flying squirrels? They do fine.

skin flap =/= wing made of fingers