MicroBlock Icecube A2 - Advance BLPC Computer (1.4 Update)

[BlazingDragon]

Huehue

Leave that up to me. ;3

Meaning???

[Ad Bot]

[Sheath]

Artifact using a Ruby A2 rev 1.3,  in The Slate Building at the Microblock Headquarters, 18th September 2011.

[BlazingDragon]

lol he told me he was on there.

Hey Icy, how did you make the generator for Isar, and how would one go about making a generator that works?

[Sheath]

I answered your question and I will not answer it further. Now you are just spamming. :c

[Crêpe]

I might app for MicroBlock, not sure

[BlazingDragon]

I answered your question and I will not answer it further. Now you are just spamming. :c

what was ur answer i didnt see it (im not joking im serious)

[Night Fox]

I only have one complaint with any of this
and it's that you have that "the first v9 eventers" or whatever below the logo
why?

[Sheath]

I only have one complaint with any of this
and it's that you have that "the first v9 eventers" or whatever below the logo
why?

Because MicroBlock was the first event clan ever made back in 2008. There has only ever been one dispute over this, but that was denied as the clan in question was not an event clan but had events as a side thought and were build focused.

The clan existed pre-iEvent pre-Blockintosh, there were no other existing event clans as far as we know. It was not so long after v9 came out MicroBlock was formed.

[Sheath]

Currently working on an official piece of hardware called the "Multirom". It comes with a piece of external hardware and a driver ROM. You stick the driver ROM in the front slot of the computer. You then can put 4 of any ROM applications into the multirom. You a press a button on the device to select which ROM you want to use, then when you hit C on the keyboard the multirom runs and executes the ROM you selected. If you change your mind, you can select one of the other 4 ROMs by clicking on the device.

In a nutshell, it lets you plugin 4 ROMs and toggle between which to run, so you don't have to keep duping ROMs in.

[SeventhSandwich]

Currently working on an official piece of hardware called the "Multirom". It comes with a piece of external hardware and a driver ROM. You stick the driver ROM in the front slot of the computer. You then can put 4 of any ROM applications into the multirom. You a press a button on the device to select which ROM you want to use, then when you hit C on the keyboard the multirom runs and executes the ROM you selected. If you change your mind, you can select one of the other 4 ROMs by clicking on the device.

In a nutshell, it lets you plugin 4 ROMs and toggle between which to run, so you don't have to keep duping ROMs in.

Why don't you just make 4 slots on the computer itself instead of building a separate, individual piece?

Also I just realized that all of these computers/devices are all just monitors. Why no tower lol?

[Sheath]

Why don't you just make 4 slots on the computer itself instead of building a separate, individual piece?

Space saving. It'd make the device huge and it wouldn't be aesthetically pleasing.

Also I just realized that all of these computers/devices are all just monitors. Why no tower lol?

An all-in one, again, is better for space. Kind of obvious. :/

[SeventhSandwich]

Space saving. It'd make the device huge and it wouldn't be aesthetically pleasing

An all-in one, again, is better for space. Kind of obvious. :/

I'm not saying this in a condescending fashion, but you've essentially contradicted yourself by saying in the first quote that you reject the all-in-one design of putting 4 ports on the monitor to save space. Then, in the second quote your explanation for the computer not having a tower is that it saves space by being inside.

Which is better, all in one or divided intelligently? :|

[Sheath]

I'm not saying this in a condescending fashion, but you've essentially contradicted yourself by saying in the first quote that you reject the all-in-one design of putting 4 ports on the monitor to save space. Then, in the second quote your explanation for the computer not having a tower is that it saves space by being inside.

There is nothing contradictory about that. Through use of good design, you can achieve both an all in one and space saving; in fact its easier. I've max out the space on the footprint.

This is going to sound mighty rude, but part of your app denial before was because you weren't very sensitive to design. So it might be best to leave that to me.

[SeventhSandwich]

This is going to sound mighty rude, but part of your app denial before was because you weren't very sensitive to design. So it might be best to leave that to me.

fair enough

[Freeze]

Macs didn't use towers till AT LEAST after the G4 eMac. I have one B)