Ethics and moralities have impeded science and our progression as a species, as far as I'm concerned
Without a care for the rest of your fellow man, why bother with science or progression? There is likely no meaning to this reality, so it is our responsibility to create our own.
Science is a collaborative enterprise, spanning of generations. We work together for the benefit of the rest of mankind. Without such purpose, why bother?
I chose the last one since that seems most fitting. One can find moral guidance outside of religion and ethics can come from anyone with an opinion or from any number of perspectives. I believe very strongly in compassion towards others and can't say I'm invested in such solely because I don't want to go to hell. After all, I don't really even believe in hell. Likewise, moral conduct and an ethical mindset are extremely important, though they very much so hinge upon compassion.
You're one of my favorite people on this forums and you are reportedly rather religious. You're a really good guy, Mage.
What does "nihilistically appealing reality" mean?
Even if we live in a world where the "Nietzsche Wannabe" was right, we still can, despite that, still create meaning.
Life seems to have no meaning, but you're nice for the sake of being nice anyway.
'Kind of implies everyone at that level thinks life has no significant meaning. That option should probably be changed a bit. Then again it states "possible", but still. 'Confusing at the first few glances.
Yes.