Author Topic: ATKitton best not be bant. (New title, JUST KIDDING!!!!)  (Read 12091 times)

Since when were you so into women's rights? I sense ulterior motives in that lustful teenage mind of yours, good sir.
Dude, I don't want ATKitton to be banned for nothing.

It might be my mind, but either we should both have the same rules and laws.

If I have to start wearing a bra at the beach so be it, but either way it's not fair.

glorious white knight, oh glorious white knight, riding into battle on your derpony!
I dance to thee, oh glorious white knight!

was it only that one image?
we had one troll come in and post worse then that, it wasn't banned.


and wasn't it just the areola? it didn't look like nipples to me.

glorious white knight, oh glorious white knight, riding into battle on your derpony!
I dance to thee, oh glorious white knight!

Never leave us oh great dancing creature who speaks odd

Since when were you so into gender equality? I sense ulterior motives in that lustful teenage mind of yours, good sir.

He may be ulterior, but I can say as a "tax paying adult" I totally agree with him.

I've always thought it was dumb that breasts are seen as objects of loveual desire and so should be hidden. If they weren't considered so taboo, then you wouldn't have the lust to begin with. This is all about the ideals of wanting things you can't have. It's why shirts for females are designed to make her tits look better, more to the imagination. But if there wasn't a law preventing that, if there wasn't this fear of being comfortable in one's own skin, I don't think half of the problems we're discussing right now would exist.

I'm not saying this because I want to see more titties. I could go out and get myself titties right now if I had to (no e-snake stroking here, I'm just saying I know girls who are like that, believe me someday you will gentlemen), but I don't want to. But if a girl wanted to walk around because it was hot outside without a shirt, I wouldn't be lusting after her. In fact, a lot of breasts look different than when they're tucked away in a shapely bra or contraption.

This is honestly a modern day loveism, methinks, and I'd like to see it changed. Puritans be damned.

Never leave us oh great dancing creature who speaks odd
no, no, follower, do not praise me, praise the all powerful white knight, who will try his hardest to not get the female of the community banned by displaying his false beliefs
oh glorious white knight~

was it only that one image?
we had one troll come in and post worse then that, it wasn't banned.
There was also one going around in a PM. The image she posted that MegaScientifical reported a ton of times had no nipple, just alot of skin.


Jetlok is being a friend right now :'c

He may be ulterior, but I can say as a "tax paying adult" I totally agree with him.

I've always thought it was dumb that breasts are seen as objects of loveual desire and so should be hidden. If they weren't considered so taboo, then you wouldn't have the lust to begin with. This is all about the ideals of wanting things you can't have. It's why shirts for females are designed to make her tits look better, more to the imagination. But if there wasn't a law preventing that, if there wasn't this fear of being comfortable in one's own skin, I don't think half of the problems we're discussing right now would exist.

I'm not saying this because I want to see more titties. I could go out and get myself titties right now if I had to (no e-snake stroking here, I'm just saying I know girls who are like that, believe me someday you will gentlemen), but I don't want to. But if a girl wanted to walk around because it was hot outside without a shirt, I wouldn't be lusting after her. In fact, a lot of breasts look different than when they're tucked away in a shapely bra or contraption.

This is honestly a modern day loveism, methinks, and I'd like to see it changed. Puritans be damned.
Yes. This.

i love loving titties


Venus Anadyomene, Titian, ca. 1525

Our chests aren't loveual.
Girls chests are.

It's completely fair Hiiro my son.

Also clothes are also for warmth you know lol.


Man2.
I hope you realize there are children on this forum and some parents would rather their children didn't see loveual parts of the body from the opposite gender.

Our chests aren't loveual.
Girls chests are.

It's completely fair Hiiro my son.

Also clothes are also for warmth you know lol.


Man2.
I hope you realize there are children on this forum and some parents would rather their children didn't see loveual parts of the body.
You're not a girl dude, lots of girls tell me that chests are lovey.
Sure, warmness, that's why they should be optional.

Our chests aren't loveual.
Girls chests are.

It's completely fair Hiiro my son.

Also clothes are also for warmth you know lol.


Man2.
I hope you realize there are children on this forum and some parents would rather their children didn't see loveual parts of the body.
they better not take them to a museum :o

Our chests aren't loveual.
Girls chests are.

It's completely fair Hiiro my son.

Also clothes are also for warmth you know lol.


Man2.
I hope you realize there are children on this forum and some parents would rather their children didn't see loveual parts of the body from the opposite gender.

What, might I ask you, makes lumps of milk producing fat loveual?

What, might I ask you, if some of the people on these forums are girls seeing pictures of girls?

What, might I ask you, is wrong with classic art?

She's pretty damn pale o.o

If tits weren't covered and you grew up with them around in beaches and stuff you'd get just as wet or hard as a chick would because of our stuff.