The fight against family values needs to be more explicit in message

[asablief]

I read it, and I honestly don't believe a word of it. There's no legitimate, hard evidence that this chromosome / gene even exists. I also noticed that they stick a negative connotation on people who think it's a choice which makes me think it's even more of an excuse.

[Ad Bot]

[YayFun]

I read it, and I honestly don't believe a word of it. There's no legitimate, hard evidence that this chromosome even exists. I also noticed that they stick a negative connotation on people who think it's a choice which makes me think it's even more of an excuse.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromosome

[asablief]

Not quite what I meant.

[Mega-Bear]

bisjac ! :D!!!!!!!

[Nickelob Ultra]

http://www.livescience.com/7056-mom-genetics-produce-gay-sons.html

False, it's actually antibodies that can cause further on sons to be gay.  Bob was born first, then Jim, then David, then Paul and then Richard.  Richard would then be likely to be more homoloveual but even then it's more of a mind thing, it's not hard-set into your chromosomes.


Relevant;
http://www.youbeauty.com/relationships/can-love-make-you-biloveual

"If anything, women’s arousal toward one gender trends female. For heteroloveual women who report no same-love attraction, Chivers has found that images of men and women are equally arousing. For women with even the slightest same-love attraction, the gender balance tips and they become progressively more aroused by women than men. “For women, there seems to be more gray area, and more potential for same-love attraction,” says Chivers."

[LizzyRascal]

People are gay. Get over it and stop fighting.

It doesn't loving matter if they were born like that or if they chose to be like that.

[Nickelob Ultra]

Thank you for not reading any other posts and not coming to the conclusion that we are discussing if it's chromosome-based or not.

Your input on homoloveuality had everything to do with the last 5 posts :|

[asablief]

Lizzy we're not attacking gays for being gay. We're arguing whether or not you can be born gay is true.

[Wehrmacht]

you have no idea what is going on in this thread
leave

[YayFun]

Perhaps this,

http://www.webmd.com/love-relationships/news/20050128/is-there-gay-gene

[Col. Burton]

HES GOT THE GAY GENE.

[Sabbin]

http://www.angelfire.com/nc/yakkow/choice.html

Read #1 and #4. Those mainly cover the debate here.

2 and 3 not as much.

[Nickelob Ultra]

Perhaps this,

http://www.webmd.com/love-relationships/news/20050128/is-there-gay-gene

On the side it had a "visual guide to ED" :(

[stuntman021]

http://www.angelfire.com/nc/yakkow/choice.html

Read #1 and #4. Those mainly cover the debate here.

2 and 3 not as much.

>angelfire
try again

[asablief]

according to a new study

This seems to be a recurring pattern.

I dont believe a single statistic that's spewed out on some health document. For all I know it could be a raving homoloveual trying to justify his insecurities by pulling facts out of his ass and publishing it on a fancy website.