It's unconstitutional.
This is a House Concurrent Resolution. It's not presented to the president and it has no legal enforcement. It's just a declaration of intent or opinion, so it can't be unconstitutional. It can be passed by a simple roll call vote which doesn't even require that all of our law makers be present to vote.
It's also just a bunch of people looking to score some quick political points from their constituents. As another example of a House Concurrent Resolution, H. Con. Res. 25 condemns the Obama Administration for directing the DOJ to stop enforcing the Defense of Marriage Act. It was sponsored by Rep. Vicky Hartzler of Montana and cosponsered by 122 other representatives, all of them Republican. In the end, I think the only point of it was so Rep. Hartzler could "prove" to his voters that he opposed Obama on this issue.
The text and sponsors of the bill can be found here:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=hc112-13You can see a list of all the bills Forbes sponsored here:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billsearch.xpd?sponsor=400137 (some of which are...
odd - note there are NO cosponsors...)
You can read more about Forbes here:
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?cycle=2012&cid=N00013799&type=IIt should be no surprise that Forbes is also running for re-election in 2012.