Author Topic: On 11/16, Congress holds hearings on the first American Internet censorship s...  (Read 24917 times)

IM JUST A BILL ..

...YES, I'M ONLY A BILL

AND I'M SITTIN' HERE ON CAPITOL HILL

It has to get past the House, then the Senate, and then Obama. If it seriously gets passed that point, I wouldn't be surprised to see it end up in the Supreme Court.

...YES, I'M ONLY A BILL

AND I'M SITTIN' HERE ON CAPITOL HILL
And I hope and pray that they will, but today I am still just a bill...

:c

...YES, I'M ONLY A BILL

AND I'M SITTIN' HERE ON CAPITOL HILL
I actually listened to that song in school today lol.

.....................ever heard of a veto
Yes.

I'm saying he can completely veto laws, but if the SC and Leg want it to happen he'd pretty much be persuaded to already

If they take away torrents I will say to take away the currency because right now like 85% people are poor and the the others are rich which isnt fair.
« Last Edit: November 16, 2011, 06:12:37 PM by CJwarrior »

If they take away torrents I will say to take away the currency.
hi hankyje

It has to get past the House, then the Senate, and then Obama. If it seriously gets passed that point, I wouldn't be surprised to see it end up in the Supreme Court.

Obama does not want censorship

He likes pr0nz

If they take away torrents I will say to take away the currency.
that'd be dumb

I wouldn't be surprised to see it end up in the Supreme Court.
only if they tried to censor things that don't deserve censorship. which they won't.

Yes.
I'm saying he can completely veto laws, but if the SC and Leg want it to happen he'd pretty much be persuaded to already
SC and Leg? I presume you mean Supreme Court and Legislature? In which case no, the Supreme Court is not involved in creating law.
If the President vetoes a bill it returns to the House and Senate where it must obtain a 2/3 majority in each to become law.

If they take away torrents I will say to take away the currency.
They can't "take away torrents". A torrent is just another way of downloading a file.
They happen to be commonly used for piracy, but that doesn't make them wrong or illegal in any way.
« Last Edit: November 16, 2011, 06:12:32 PM by Fredulus »

If the President vetoes a bill it returns to the House and Senate where it must obtain a 2/3 majority in each.

I forgot about that part.

Torrents are to piracy as guns are to murder.
The person does the crime not the tool.


SC and Leg? I presume you mean Supreme Court and Legislature? In which case no, the Supreme Court is not involved in creating law.
If the President vetoes a bill it returns to the House and Senate where it must obtain a 2/3 majority in each to become law.
Oh right.

My mistake

Torrents are to piracy as guns are to murder.
The person does the crime not the tool.

Guns don't kill people, people kill people.

That'd be like saying, "OGM CAR CRASH KILLED 5 PEOPLE BAN CARS"