STRONG - Rick Perry <333333

[Bisjac]

and what key variations would 10 parties have to all be different from each other, pray-tell?

to often we are left with a majority senate/congress of 1 party, and a president of the other. the pres infinitely veto's everything, and nothing gets done for 4-6 years. depends what sides gets elections next that changes it.
even worse is if you get a tri-mono party government for a bit. they will pass everything they create, and instantly have their way without a fight. thats scary as well.

a house full of 6+ parties will never tie. and whatever party controls the white house will be forced to vote both ways on every other bill.

instead, as of now; we are stuck with a government that dosnt move
think about the budget bills we keep failing on right now. this is the main cause for its failure.

[Ad Bot]

[Vegetarian Zombie]

to often we are left with a majority senate/congress of 1 party, and a president of the other. the pres infinitely veto's everything, and nothing gets done for 4-6 years. depends what sides gets elections next that changes it.

a house full of 6+ parties will never tie. and whatever party controls the white house will be forced to vote both ways on every other bill.

instead, as of now; we are stuck with a government that dosnt move

I have to agree, but gov't has come to compromises that Obama vetos every time

He's pushing a 100% liberal adjenda and does not tolerate anything else

[Firecycle]

to often we are left with a majority senate/congress of 1 party, and a president of the other. the pres infinitely veto's everything, and nothing gets done for 4-6 years. depends what sides gets elections next that changes it.

a house full of 6+ parties will never tie. and whatever party controls the white house will be forced to vote both ways on every other bill.

instead, as of now; we are stuck with a government that dosnt move

I agree with this, but more parties are not the answer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tWHJfhiyo&feature=relmfu

This is what we need more:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Y3jE3B8HsE&feature=relmfu

[Bisjac]

i think a roman tribunal government is best :D

randomly select citizens that sign up for a 2 year term. they can vote on bills and cannot be veto'd by the president(s) 1 from each party, who can only create bills and cant vote on em.
can do this for senate and congress.

a system like this would make the average person want to pay more attention to government goin-ons. and they would generally be more educated in it as well.

of course without the emperor above them lol

[Firecycle]

i think a roman tribunal government is best :D

randomly select citizens that sign up for a 2 year term. they can vote on bills and cannot be veto'd by the president(s) 1 from each party, who can only create bills and cant vote on em.
can do this for senate and congress.

a system like this would make the average person want to pay more attention to government goin-ons. and they would generally be more educated in it as well.

of course without the emperor above them lol

[Bisjac]

no, serious

[Tom Gunn]

according to god, chirstians have the right to share and convert.
the problem is, this right inflicts upon other's right to not be converted.

Bullstuff, if you understood the word "share" then you would know that that means you can reject the offer or accept it. You are so full of stuff.

[Bisjac]

little sensitive? pray to your god about it then.

the government protects against religious prosecution. that you christians promote.

[Tom Gunn]

little sensitive? pray to your god about it then.

the government protects against religious prosecution. that you christians promote.

I'm agnostic. It just bugs the hell out of me how you can be promoting of all the good stuff, especially on rights, yet be so terribly anti religious.

[Bisjac]

religions do have rights. its everyone else that is still catching up.
religions are fighting them the whole way

[Tom Gunn]

Meh, the way things work are all screwballed anyway.

[Bisjac]

i sound anti religion when i talk about equal rights, because religions are already above equal rights in many many places. yet they have the balls to demand more as if they are entitled.
every other group still needs more rights to be yet considered equal, yet religion attempts to hinder them.

any christian that thinks they are equal or less equal then another group, is a dangerous fundamentalist.

[Tom Gunn]

You're coming from a different presupposition, where I am as well. So I guess you probably think that almost any Christian fundamentalist would be willing to blow up a building?

[Bisjac]

You're coming from a different presupposition, where I am as well. So I guess you probably think that almost any Christian fundamentalist would be willing to blow up a building?

of course not. the term fundamentalist itself is a lie, as no christian is following the creed of their god properly anyways. they make it up as they go along to justify their own world view.

i use the word to describe super conservatives

[Tom Gunn]

I can agree with that. But not completely. There are some Christians out there who are doing it right, but you seem to assume that perhaps all Christians think alike therefore creating your own stereotype of what you make them to be.