Christianity for kids? (THIS SITE IS NOT SERIOUS}

[masterockets]

I'm curious if it's better to be a quadruped or a Bipedal creature.

either way we can still trip and fall

[Ad Bot]

[Böltster]

I'm curious if it's better to be a quadruped or a Bipedal creature.

Well considering quadruped creatures don't have the capacity to consider whether it would be better to be bipedal, i'd say we're probably better of as we are.

As for convergent evolution, it could just as easily be a common designer, rather then a common ancestor.

The idea in convergent evolution is that there doesn't have to be common ANYTHING for species to evolve the same.

[Tom Gunn]

Huh. I think I like my hands too much to consider having to walk on all fours.

[Mysteroo]

Under the "criticisms" tab of The drake equation. on the page I was reading

Criticism of the Drake equation follows mostly from the observation that several terms in the equation are largely or entirely based on conjecture. Thus the equation cannot be used to draw firm conclusions of any kind. As Michael Crichton, a science fiction author, stated in a 2003 lecture at Caltech:[25]

    The problem, of course, is that none of the terms can be known, and most cannot even be estimated. The only way to work the equation is to fill in with guesses. [...] As a result, the Drake equation can have any value from "billions and billions" to zero. An expression that can mean anything means nothing. Speaking precisely, the Drake equation is literally meaningless...

Another objection is that the very form of the Drake equation assumes that civilizations arise and then die out within their original solar systems. If interstellar colonization is possible, then this assumption is invalid, and the equations of population dynamics would apply instead.[26]

One reply to such criticisms[27] is that even though the Drake equation currently involves speculation about unmeasured parameters, it was not meant to be science, but intended as a way to stimulate dialogue on these topics. Then the focus becomes how to proceed experimentally. Indeed, Drake originally formulated the equation merely as an agenda for discussion at the Green Bank conference.[28]

[Böltster]

Under the "criticisms" tab of The drake equation. on the page I was reading

There's still more science behind it then your "lol nope we're the only ones" hypothesis

[Doomonkey]

Ideally we would have more arms. I can't think of too many negatives about having more arms.

However, I'm not sure about four legs. There are positives and negatives. And because the only thing we can go off of is earth, we really can't be too sure how a sentient quadruped would adapt to its environment.

It includes number of star formation- which we've never seen a star form. The only thing we've seen is a light popping up in a place we didn't notice it before. There is no evidence that that is a star formation.

Actually, we have pictures of stars forming in nebulae.

[Slugger]

Holy shiiiiit

"Hey professor! Haven't dinos been extinct for millions of years?"

"Wrong little buddy. Dinosaurs still walk on the land and swim in the seas! And the Earth is less than 10,000 years old!

And the next one calls the T-rex an herbivore, I need to rage.


This is why I hate Christianity sometimes :c. It makes no sense.

[Col. Burton]

an herbivore

I need to rage.

[Mysteroo]

There's still more science behind it then your "lol nope we're the only ones" hypothesis

Never said there wasn't. I also never said it like that. I just see no evidence of aliens existence. The only "evidence" I've ever seen is sightings of Hot air balloons, lights, and aircrafts. And there are so many conditions that have to be met in order for life to even be possible, that the odds are extremely low.

Actually, we have pictures of stars forming in nebulae.

We see super nova's all the time, but the only pictures I've seen don't seem like strong evidence of star formation at all.

This is why I hate Christianity sometimes :c. It makes no sense.

Ugh
Ima say it again
We do not all think this way. Stop looking at one thing, and assuming that all Christians are that way

Also is that a Lotro avatar? :o

[Slugger]

-snip-

I said Christianity, not Christians. As far as I understand that could be called a "correct" practice of Christianity.

Also it makes sense for other life, trillions of stars? There are too many planets to count there, so its safe to assume there is other life in the universe.

[FFSO]

What the forget

[Mysteroo]

I said Christianity, not Christians. As far as I understand that could be called a "correct" practice of Christianity.

Almost every Christian I've met has their own personal beliefs different form all the rest. There is no "correct" way. There is lots of disagreement, that's why there are different branches of Christianity.

[Böltster]

We see super nova's all the time, but the only pictures I've seen don't seem like strong evidence of star formation at all.

So you're an astrophysicist too? You must have a lot of scientific training under your belt to be able to judge things like that so whimsically.

[Mysteroo]

So you're an astronomer too? You must have a lot of scientific training under your belt to be able to judge things like that so whimsically.

I meant pictures I've seen online. And I'm pretty sure it's obvious that's what I meant. Why is it obvious that that's what Doomonkey meant and not me?

It's getting late my time, and I can see I'm getting nowhere. A lot of what I'm seeing is things being taken out of context and insults.
So I think I'm done with this topic for now.

[Toasty_Enginner]

Why not zoidburg?