A rational, non-religious reason why research might be bad for you

[Bisjac]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpXAxvfPOd4

Summarized: Over indulgence in research may raise your standards for women too high, and make you much more critical of their appearance, thus also making it more difficult to find and keep a satisfactory mate in your view.

you are making an unfair judgement yourself.

that all research only has the hottest fake titted, model girls you were referring to.
while its actually a huge minority in research.

and if you are talking about no fat chicks. well i support that. fatties should not be protected. they spread a culture of unhealthy thinking and carelessness.

the propaganda we are use to is that "dont teach kids to need to be thin"
while we ignore the fact that kids in general arent even taking care of themselves at all.

[Ad Bot]

[Bisjac]

plus what the hell research do you guys look at anyways?

i havnt seen anything less then amateur in the last 10 years. because thats where the good stuff is.
paid site type content =/= professional. unless its dried up playboy and penthouse or something ancient like that.

real research is no name woman hired on the fly. thats half the research industry. the good stuff.

small tits have been IN style for like 10 years now. where have you guys been?

[Saber15]

so basically this.

http://i.imgur.com/FMRln.jpg

[Dodger]

The minority supermodel kind is still very popular among a good number of viewers. I do admit I was generalizing a bit. I do realize that everyone does not view research in the same way or the same kind of research, but to a certain percentage of viewers, it can have that psychological effect. We also can't think everyone is with the times as you said, considering not all of us watch the same amount of it or delve as deep into the various categories of it, and also that we have different preferences and turn offs.

[Woolys]

Actually, my preset high standards for women make it hard to fap to research since they're usually all ugly to me. I prefer women who don't look, "typical pretty." I want alternative beauty, the type of beauty you'd find in an every day not-ugly-as-forget-researchstar woman.

I was like this before also

[Bisjac]

If both you and your partner have no others to compare your partner to loveually, and you have an entire lifetime to perfect your love life, then your love is going to be pretty damn awesome.

im a supporter of opinion, i dont discount your theory on just that.
but this is baseless. you are implying people who have had love before marriage at ALL cannot enjoy love as much.
you are also stating that enjoyment has anything to do with practicing love to begin with. that isnt fully true.

you don't have to worry about STDs.

this is a lie. as a about half of them can be born with because of parents having them already, or can be caught easily without needing love. this includes all the real bad ones to.
this was always a classic religious propaganda statement.

[james4115]

so basically this.

http://i.imgur.com/FMRln.jpg

"grand canyon national park"
I'M DYING

[Woolys]

so basically this.

http://i.imgur.com/FMRln.jpg

Why are you calling muscles "mistakes" in this image?

[Nickelob Ultra]

Pro vids suck for me, they're full of horsestuff.  I like amateur videos.

[Saber15]

Why are you calling muscles "mistakes" in this image?

i didn't make it, brah.

[Col. Burton]

Over indulgence in research may raise your standards for women too high

My standards for women aren't high at all, and I have friends that send me links to research all the time.

[Menen]

Nope. Unless you are some egotistical prick that only cares about looks, this might be true.

If you care about the person themselves regardless of their body then research will not affect you.

[james4115]

My standards for women aren't high at all, and I have friends that send me links to research all the time.

sharing is caring

[Col. Burton]

sharing is caring

its fur research <33

[IkeTheGeneric]

its fur research <33

ew thanks for sharing!
sicko