Author Topic: 2 rants about Apple  (Read 3051 times)

I didn't even do heavy proofreading in this, including the removal of flaws and unambiguity, however they turned out pretty well without it.

1

Businesses wanting to compete in the mobile app market are forced to buy Macs in order to compete across the diverse family of mobile devices. Bigger businesses, such as developing teams of well-established companies or ones with bigger budgets, will not hesitate to buy Macs for development – whereas smaller or solo developing groups will not be able to or not have the willingness to buy Macs.

The average person will never have a problem with this, so this Apple can get away with the anti-competition distribution method of their iOS SDK.

---------
2
HTC has created Android phones because of which Apple sued HTC for patent infringement. Apple won the case, banning the import of the phones into the US, effective in April. The patent infringed is for the storage of unstructured content (the “contact”) in a document (such as contact data for one person, like e-mail, phone number, address) and its retrieval and parsing of said content into recognizable details. After parsing, the organized data can be used in applications for dialing phone numbers, texting to numbers, e-mailing to the contact, or locating the address of the contact on a map.

The patent is extremely ambiguous; it does not describe any specific file format, only that the patented program looks for the presence of recognizable structures, one that anybody can recognize. The fact that any human can recognize these patterns, and sped up by computing power makes for a poor basis for a patent.

Steve Jobs said in a press release to about the HTC lawsuit: “We can sit by and watch competitors steal our patented inventions, or we can do something about it. We’ve decided to do something about it. We think competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology, not steal ours.”

Nothing is more ironic than Steve Jobs, in a quote defending Apple trying to use a patent with non-specific details to shut out competition, stating in the same quote that he thinks competition is healthy.

Wait, so no more Androids?

Wait, so no more Androids?
I'll help you out since you didn't read it.  :cookieMonster:

tl;dr Apple does things to promote an Apple-only market, and it works very well. Apple dominates because of their patents on dumb things like "square devices."

Wait, so no more Androids?

Incorrect. HTC has until April 12 to solve thier UI problems, which is a non-issue for them. They could easily fix it by just removing the ability to save phone numbers received by email and such.

I'll help you out since you didn't read it.  :cookieMonster:

tl;dr Apple does things to promote an Apple-only market, and it works very well. Apple dominates because of their patents on dumb things like "square devices."
I did read it. :c

op is jelly because he has an android

op is jelly because customer support wont listen to him when he said he dropped him ipod in a tuna jar

I don't have an iPod nor an Android.

Apple is slowly creating a monopoly. I think its bullstuff that the government isn't doing anything.

its not like they are trying to make money or anything, trying to slow rivals, in a totally legal way.


Apple is slowly creating a monopoly. I think its bullstuff that the government isn't doing anything.
Monopolies are legal in a Capitalistic society. Of course they aren't going to do jack about it silly.

its not like they are trying to make money or anything, trying to slow rivals, in a totally legal way.
The patent was nonspecific and shouldn't even have passed review. Yes, it's legal, but that doesn't mean it's right.

Monopolies are legal in a Capitalistic society. Of course they aren't going to do jack about it silly.
Not in the US, monopolies are (supposed to be) banned after what happened with Rockefeller taking over the oil market in the early 1900s.

Not in the US, monopolies are (supposed to be) banned after what happened with Rockefeller taking over the oil market in the early 1900s.
beat me to it.
monopolies are not allowed, i think it was viacom or something that had to cut back on dominating television somewhat recently.

beat me to it.
monopolies are not allowed, i think it was viacom or something that had to cut back on dominating television somewhat recently.
Not in the US, monopolies are (supposed to be) banned after what happened with Rockefeller taking over the oil market in the early 1900s.
Quote
In many jurisdictions, competition laws restrict monopolies. Holding a dominant position or a monopoly of a market is not illegal in itself, however certain categories of behavior can, when a business is dominant, be considered abusive and therefore incur legal sanctions.
Apple is clearly being abusive in this case with which I agree.

beat me to it.
monopolies are not allowed, i think it was viacom or something that had to cut back on dominating television somewhat recently.
I'm sure if Apple ever hits that point, they will be prevented by this kind of deal.

This just sort of paves the way for this happening.  We can't say for sure that it will happen absolutely.  Either way, I'm sticking with Android anyway.  I used to want an iPhone 4S until I figured Android was just a lot better anyway.