Author Topic: Photography by a fat-as  (Read 1879 times)

They're low-quality JPEG due to compression. Otherwise you'll have a 11MB page full of people whining about image size.

Anyways, I took pictures of some woods. I know them by the back of my hand cause I GO OUTSIDE ALOT OKAY?!?!










I took said pictures cause I was bored and the snow-capped trees were beautiful....


aint it prety


Rule of 3rds, do you speak it?

Also the first few photos are extremely noisy.

Also the first few photos are extremely noisy.

I have an old camera :c

still pretty good quality though I just had to tone done some of the quality due to the images being so large

10/10 the snow repesents sadnes


hey nice fo-
I saw your leg
:(

I think they're rather nice though.

The only one that's kinda ok is the one with the patches without snow, that was kind of cool.

BUT.

A good thing to have in mind when taking photos is, when you want to take a picture, stop and think "Okay, what do I find interesting about this scene?" and then "How do I call attention to that and cut away any other visual fluff?" A lot of these photos really lack a subject and the ones (well, one or two) where it was clear what you wanted to take a picture of (other than, look! Trees! Snow!) you could've done a much better job of composing then framing it.

The other thing when you're taking pictures of trees/forest is that a lot of what makes the scene pretty when you're standing there is motion, depth perception, and the wide angle view of your eyes. To eliminate boring, bad pictures of trees, stop moving, close one eye, and make a frame out of your fingers and hold it about a foot in front of your face, pointed at wherever you would take a picture. If what's inside your fingers is still interesting, then take out your camera. If it's boring, then keep walking.

The only one that's kinda ok is the one with the patches without snow, that was kind of cool.

BUT.

A good thing to have in mind when taking photos is, when you want to take a picture, stop and think "Okay, what do I find interesting about this scene?" and then "How do I call attention to that and cut away any other visual fluff?" A lot of these photos really lack a subject and the ones (well, one or two) where it was clear what you wanted to take a picture of (other than, look! Trees! Snow!) you could've done a much better job of composing then framing it.

The other thing when you're taking pictures of trees/forest is that a lot of what makes the scene pretty when you're standing there is motion, depth perception, and the wide angle view of your eyes. To eliminate boring, bad pictures of trees, stop moving, close one eye, and make a frame out of your fingers and hold it about a foot in front of your face, pointed at wherever you would take a picture. If what's inside your fingers is still interesting, then take out your camera. If it's boring, then keep walking.


Well the thing is that my family can't afford to take care of the woods anymore, so I'm taking 'progress pictures' of the overgrowth of the woods. I wasn't aiming to make it look pretty, just to cover a lot of ground, and check up on some of the spots I am most familiar with.

It used to be flat, even rows of trees and then my mom and dad just sort of let it go.

I have hundreds of pictures of the woods from over the years, but these ones just seemed cool cause everything was covered in snow.

By the way, here's an untouched photo of my hand on a big tree

It's very big.
« Last Edit: January 14, 2012, 02:15:42 PM by IkeTheGeneric »

By the way, here's an untouched photo of my hand on a big tree

It's very big.
Thats just weird


Those are all very beautiful except for the one where your foot is seen.

GIVE ME MY SNOW BITCH

Bump for nice pictures.