The USA is gone

[Nickelob Ultra]

4:01 PM - Fredulus: lol im banned
4:01 PM - Comrade Mikoyan: nice
4:02 PM - Comrade Mikoyan: how long?
4:02 PM - Comrade Mikoyan: week?
4:02 PM - Fredulus: ya

Can't you get banned for doing this repeatedly too?

[Ad Bot]

[Jacob/Lee]

the point im trying to make is youre an internet nerd with no life that no one cares about

User was banned for this post

Thank god.

[Dissolve]

For the record if the bill does do what you say I am against it 100% but I just don't see where any of that is said.

[Daemon18553]

Warning - while you were typing 6 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.

Vat.

[Freeze]

there's an occasional ban for posting for banned users
not a perma though

[Nickelob Ultra]

Then please provide source information that's reliable.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:KaGqnX26bcwJ:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Defense_Authorization_Act_for_Fiscal_Year_2012#Indefinite_detention_without_trial:_Section_1021

This is Google's cache of the webpage as it is on Jan 17, 2012 11:05:30 GMT, which is just about yesterday around 6 AM EST I think.  I gave a cached version because otherwise you wouldn't be able to read it.

there's an occasional ban for posting for banned users
not a perma though

Perma would be too much for that unless it was like the 7th ban that user had anyway.  Still sort of an unwritten rule though but okay.

I wasn't posting for him though :S

Well then stop sucking his richard please.

For the record if the bill does do what you say I am against it 100% but I just don't see where any of that is said.

Bills like to dodge around being straightforward.  They do this so people don't figure out the actual intent.  That is why this almost managed to slip people's attention until small groups of people began to notice, then they spread the word over Congress' recess and since it has grown in talk.

[Mikoyan]

there's an occasional ban for posting for banned users
not a perma though

I wasn't posting for him though :S

[IkeTheGeneric]

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:KaGqnX26bcwJ:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Defense_Authorization_Act_for_Fiscal_Year_2012#Indefinite_detention_without_trial:_Section_1021

This is Google's cache of the webpage as it is on Jan 17, 2012 11:05:30 GMT, which is just about yesterday around 6 AM EST I think.  I gave a cached version because otherwise you wouldn't be able to read it.

:c

[Nickelob Ultra]

:c

Yeah, now you see where we're getting at?  It's stuff like this that is causing people like me to throw temper tantrums about it.

[Daemon18553]

[Mikoyan]

stop sucking his richard please.

I wasn't sucking his snake, we were just talking.

[Night Fox]

the point im trying to make is youre an internet nerd with no life that no one cares about

User was banned for this post

I bet you feel like a dumbass now

[Daemon18553]

I wasn't sucking his snake, we were just talking.

That's what I do in conversation. It's common courtesy. :O

[Chrono]

I wasn't sucking his snake, we were just talking.

Well sorry to say, but we don't want to hear what he has to say.

Him being banned is supposed to be a relief but that gets ruined when people just keep bringing banned peoples' words into the forums.

[Dissolve]

I still don't see where it actually says that in the bill itself.

I see wikipedia.

I don't see it on the bill.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c112:2:./temp/~c112s9u7dK::

please tell me where it is because I am either blind or don't see it.