Poll

Do you?

OH YEAH!
34 (32.7%)
GOODNESS NO!
70 (67.3%)

Total Members Voted: 104

Author Topic: Does anyone honestly want Obama to be elected again?  (Read 4653 times)

Every debate I see, the more I love Gingrich.
I hope your joking.

Otherwise, you're an idiot, and there's absolutely nothing stating otherwise.

Newt is a great Christian, and therefore a great American.

Just because he had 4+ wives and multiple affairs doesn't make him a bad candidate, Lalam, especially when he's found peace with The Lord.

It's hilarious how people can excuse their bad decisions by resorting to religion.

People will abort their babies regardless [of Anti-Abortion Laws], no matter how sad it is.

Okay then, maybe we should legalize murder, people do that anyway, despite there being laws.  We should also legalize rape, robbery and Dunk Driving, because people do it anyway.  That sounds like a fantastic idea.

I saw something that applies to this.

"You voted for Obama in 2008 to prove you weren't tribal. Now vote for someone else in 2012 to prove you aren't stupid."

You cant fix the economy in 4 years since china owns America. So far, this depression is 1/3rd of the length of the great depression.

I don't really give a forget who I vote for this year. The people I would actually like to see in office won't win regardless of my votes. I loving hate our handicapped backward ass party system. I'll probably just vote Obama because I hate all these republican douches.

Vermin Supreme 2012-2016

I don't really give a forget who I vote for this year. The people I would actually like to see in office won't win regardless of my votes. I loving hate our handicapped backward ass party system. I'll probably just vote Obama because I hate all these republican douches.
Then you're just playing into the hands of the "handicapped backward ass party system" just as so many other stupid brainwashed americans

Oh great this topic is going into a meltdown now

I would not vote for Obama

Top candidates:

1. Ron Paul I have to admit. I dislike his lack of knowledge in foreign policy matters though. I'm not going to pull out the isolationist card, but he just doesn't seem to know how war works, considering it's inevitable no matter how you look at it. Also, he's a tribal in his newsletters, and the fact that he tries to throw it aside is pretty sad

2. Gingrich. I dislike him only because he can't communicate with people, I don't care how much he is accused of being in the pockets of corporations.

Okay then, maybe we should legalize murder, people do that anyway, despite there being laws.  We should also legalize rape, robbery and Dunk Driving, because people do it anyway.  That sounds like a fantastic idea.
Instead of nitpicking through common purposes, look at the situation as a whole.  Abortion can help children who have parents that may be aware of their inability to properly care for them.  In any case, if they are born and the individual cannot, they put them up for adoption, leaving them to a relatively poor life if left an orphan.

While it's not too difficult to see this as being a crime, viewing these people as being completely sociopathic and otherwise purposely trying to kill another individual, it's also apparent that you aren't really aware of the real situation to which these people are faced.

I saw something that applies to this.

"You voted for Obama in 2008 to prove you weren't tribal. Now vote for someone else in 2012 to prove you aren't stupid."
I voted for Obama because McCain isn't considerably sane.

Then you're just playing into the hands of the "handicapped backward ass party system" just as so many other stupid brainwashed americans
Explain what else I could do?

The fact that he passed a bill without the consent of Congress?
Out of curiosity, what bill might you be referring to?

Instead of nitpicking through common purposes, look at the situation as a whole.  Abortion can help children who have parents that may be aware of their inability to properly care for them.  In any case, if they are born and the individual cannot, they put them up for adoption, leaving them to a relatively poor life if left an orphan.

Foster homes are actually more effective than one might think initially. Adoption in the US is actually pretty good compared to most other countries.

While it's not too difficult to see this as being a crime, viewing these people as being completely sociopathic and otherwise purposely trying to kill another individual, it's also apparent that you aren't really aware of the real situation to which these people are faced.

The "MURDERER" claim and belligerence against pro-choicers is pretty dumb, but I'm still not comfortable with the fact that we can terminate a a unique (unless it splits after fertilization), human offspring with usually 46 chromosomes and all of it's mutations along with it, just because it brings inconvenience to the parents. The cells are alive before it's born, by the way.