Author Topic: Women Who Are Raped Should Have Their Rapist’s Baby Because It’s A Gift From God  (Read 8280 times)

Well, lets say rape happens.

Oh noes, a baby is coming.

Kill the damn rapist. - This is the first conclusion we should obtain, pretty soon, not alot of rapeists exist, and this rape becomes a small problem.

I'm against abortion but, we always take about the baby, kill, no kill, kill, no kill? No. Solve the damn problem.

Damn it, kill the rapist.

Children do not think deeply. I might be immature, but I think deeply enough to understand killing isn't a simple thing. You don't kill someone for anything. You punish them to the fullest extent for all the bad, but there is a background to be heard, and peace to be made. Killing is a last option, not a first.


Well, lets say rape happens.Well, say we kill the rapist.

Oh noes, a baby is coming.


Kill the damn rapist. - This is the first conclusion we should obtain, pretty soon, not alot of rapeists exist, and this rape becomes a small problem. Now what the forget do we do about the baby.

I'm against abortion but, we always take about the baby, kill, no kill, kill, no kill? No. Solve the damn problem.

Damn it, kill the rapist.

Your post was one of the dumbest things I've read all day. You tried to prove a point that is not only an unnecessary one, but an invalid one.

Children do not think deeply. I might be immature, but I think deeply enough to understand killing isn't a simple thing. You don't kill someone for anything. You punish them to the fullest extent for all the bad, but there is a background to be heard, and peace to be made. Killing is a last option, not a first.
For rape, or murder I believe it is the first.

In the case of murder, as capital punishment goes down, homicide goes up. Thats a fact. So if you excute people for murder, less people get murdered. Cool, the human killing human death rate is the same no matter what you do.

What is the difference? If you have more executions than homicides the guility, screwed-up-sick-mind-damn-dirty-guility fools die INSTEAD of innocent whoevers.

Total Fact.

In the case of abortion it is almost the same thing, who are you going to murder, the baby? Thats sick. The Rapist, good idea. This senetor has a good end goal, but his way of getting there, which is more or less lets all be friends while I made things illegal, is not going to work.

In the case of murder, as capital punishment goes down, homicide goes up. Thats a fact.

This is plain not true.

Your post was one of the dumbest things I've read all day. You tried to prove a point that is not only an unnecessary one, but an invalid one.

Woah woah woah, first off there is no argument in your entire statement. I believe my point is valid.

Btw, I'm not defending Rick, I'm asking a good question? Who dies? Because weather you like it or not, someone is going to die. The baby is human from conception, murdering it just like killing a three month old.

Abortion is the symtom of the problem. Rapists are going to rape as long as the law doesn't really stop them.
« Last Edit: January 24, 2012, 02:18:04 AM by Choneis »

Furthermore Choenis's whole point seems to ignore the fact that you have BOTH problems, not just one. Just because you execute the rapist does not mean the baby suddenly is no longer a problem.
He doesn't even consider that the person who was raped may have been underage.

Murdering one person is just as bad as murdering another.
Except in this case, the baby isn't even fully developed yet and doesn't even know it's alive.**

The baby is human from conception, murdering it just like killing a three month old.



is not the same as


I see where your coming from, I'm no freshman to this sort of debate.
Furthermore Choenis's whole point seems to ignore the fact that you have BOTH problems, not just one. Just because you execute the rapist does not mean the baby suddenly is no longer a problem.
He doesn't even consider that the person who was raped may have been underage.
Your right. Absolutely, kill every rapist, give it 1 year and the problem will halve, and halve and halve again. So in the end, less killing.

What I'm saying does sound insensetive, but somebody is going to die, which brings us to the next point.
Murdering one person is just as bad as murdering another.
Except in this case, the baby isn't even fully developed yet and doesn't even know it's alive.**
This is, where I believe as strong a fact that the sky is blue, that your wrong. As I've said I'm no freshman to this subject. The Baby knows that it is alive, from a witness of abortion the Baby felt pain and attempted to swim away from the tube that was about to turn him into paste. Fact, prue fact. Weather you believe me or not, your problem.

This is the reason why I believe.


You're saying if we kill all people you think are the problem, no more problematic people will ever exist?

Yep, that one is a year younger than the other.

A days old egg does not have a brain, consciousness, thoughts, emotions, or expression. It is not comparable to a 3 month old baby.


You're saying if we kill all people you think are the problem, no more problematic people will ever exist?

Who would you rather kill?

Unless your Rick, who thinks everyone can live on.


No, I'm Steve. Everyone else is either a Skeleton, Spider, Zombie, Silverfish, Pig, Sheep, Cow, Chicken, Squid, or Wolf to me.