Very much so. Spoons are banned in my town after a group of people robbed the bank with a spoon at the managers head.
Upon being released from solitary confinement, he experiences a psychotic episode in the prison cafeteria and attacks McCain, stabbing him to death with a spoon in full view of the prison staff and the convict population.
Depends if the gun is loaded or not.You also have to look at it this way.Situation 1:Spoon vs unarmed innocent kid = spoon thrusted into neck or eye (with chance of seeing it coming and preventing it)Situation 2:gun (with ammo) vs unarmed innocent kid = projectile entering the body causing damage to internal organs (perhaps the brain) (with chance of missing and being knocked down)Both are capable of killing someone. Just because the gun will beat a spoon in a fight, doesn't mean it's more dangerous. You have to consider that this most likely wont be a fight between the two weapons, rather, someone armed and with intentions of killing against someone (possibly unaware) who is unarmed and with intentions of having a normal daily life.
What about a nuclear bomb vs a rock? Which is more dangerous? They're both weapons.
What about a nuclear bomb vs a rock? Which is more dangerous? They're both weapons.A gun is more dangerous than a spoon. Finish.
Guns don't kill people. People kill people.Though spoons do kill people. Evil sons of bitches, they are.
loving deadly, stay away:
Ever seen that short film that had a name similiar to "The slow murderer with the extremely inefficient weapon"?
The right thing now is to punch that bitch in the face with another pair of brass knuckles
Brass knuckles are illegal. You're buying an illegal weapon in school. You're lucky you're not expelled.
