Author Topic: Kochieboy's Thread of Philosophy  (Read 2091 times)

no, you have no choice but to believe in a political party
if you think that there's a single political party you don't believe in, for the sake of mankind, let's all hope that's because it was made up
that doesn't even make any sense.

if you, "believe" in something, you're having confidence or faith in the truth of something without actually knowing whether it's right or not.


wrong

time is a liquid that is injected into each and every molecule by little tiny time elves with syringes each controlled by a time foreman.

things that move fast have better foreman.
Liquid is quantum based. It's states can never fully be determined due to it's constant metamorphosis. To capture water in a bucket in it's current form would require freezing time.

Liquid is quantum based. It's states can never fully be determined due to it's constant metamorphosis. To capture water in a bucket in it's current form would require freezing time.
I disagree

that doesn't even make any sense.
if you, "believe" in something, you're having confidence or faith in the truth of something without actually knowing whether it's right or not.
no, if you believe in something, you think it exists

Why the hell do particles stop behaving in wierd quantumways when they are combined into huge amounts anyways?

no, if you believe in something, you think it exists
You're using believe in only one matter of context.

That's like saying that the word vote means:

"To either support the democratic or republican political party".



so are you
No I'm not.

Give me one example of believe that does not fall within my definition.

I disagree
I disagree with your disagree therefore equaling out the argument.

To transcend beyond all that condemn us, to stop the violation of false precedence,

Join me, in the minds of all that are with and without the truth of knowing that there is no difference between fact and opinion, only knowledge.

No I'm not.
Give me one example of believe that does not fall within my definition.
what?
mine was being used just as correctly as yours is, I never even implied you were using it wrong

There is NO Right or Wrong answers.
'Oh we can't argue over right and wrong? LETS ARGUE OVER THE DEFENITION OF IT THEN.'

athesim is ebst umad chistcigarettes


I find religions to be weaker as they are just prepackaged packets of philosophy for the ones too lazy to design their own.

« Last Edit: February 25, 2012, 04:30:29 PM by BBOY »