From the locked topic from just a minute ago... wanted to bring this discussion over here:
invisible children is a shady nonprofit that only puts 31% of donations to good use
But how do you define "Good use"?
If they hadn't spent this much on the development of the actual movie then do you think so many people would now about this and would be donating? That 31% is probably more than 100% of if they hadn't been clever and raised awareness on the issue.
On the other hand there are rumors of the Ugandan government itself using child soldiers which makes them just as bad as Kony if not worse. Some believe Kony is fighting for a good cause and he deny's accusations of kidnapping children and severing limbs off of captives. The only proof so far is the testimonies of children who claim to have been kidnapped by him. Who is to say these children weren't payed by the Ugandan government to spread lies like this to bring Kony down?
Unfortunately as people who are in an entirely different country and can't believe either side's accusations of each other then we will probably never know who was actually telling the truth. Currently though, Kony is being portrayed as the 'bad guy' and that's how he is generally accepted.