special interestes Redux -Forum Mental Institute...-

[Wynd_Fox]

ANYWAY, if you special interestes have to be loveual, then I have none. If not, then I find intelligence, slight (quite slight indeed) muscularity, blonde hair, intelligence, blue eyes, underweight-lower end of average weight, short-shortish hair, intelligence, and slightly effeminate features to all be quite nice. But none of those things are a deal maker, nor is a lack a deal breaker. In fact, a guy could possess all of those traits and I might not like him. That's not really the devotion that special interestism seems to imply, that's more of personal tastes.

EDIT: I FORGOT THAT I LIKE TALL GUYS. Not as tall as me (because I wish I was slightly shorter), but close.

[Ad Bot]

[Darkness ZXW]

ANYWAY, if you special interestes have to be loveual, then I have none. If not, then I find intelligence, slight (quite slight indeed) muscularity, blonde hair, intelligence, blue eyes, underweight-lower end of average weight, short-shortish hair, intelligence, and slightly effeminate features to all be quite nice.

you said intelligence twice

[Wynd_Fox]

That's two strikes against you, lol, I said it three times. The other strike being age.

[Darkness ZXW]

That's two strikes against you, lol, I said it three times. The other strike being age.

well it's 2:53 :c

[Axolotl2]

well it's 2:53 :c

12:11 AM brb going to sleep

[TeslaCoil]

ANYWAY, if you special interestes have to be loveual, then I have none. If not, then I find intelligence, slight (quite slight indeed) muscularity, blonde hair, intelligence, blue eyes, underweight-lower end of average weight, short-shortish hair, intelligence, and slightly effeminate features to all be quite nice. But none of those things are a deal maker, nor is a lack a deal breaker. In fact, a guy could possess all of those traits and I might not like him. That's not really the devotion that special interestism seems to imply, that's more of personal tastes.

They don't have to be loveual. I could construct a divider in the Poll for a non loveual section.

[Electrk]

They don't have to be loveual. I could construct a divider in the Poll for a non loveual section.

Then people would vote for the divider lol

[Axolotl2]

They don't have to be loveual. I could construct a divider in the Poll for a non loveual section.

Isn't a special interest supposed to be a non-loveual thing that makes you loveually aroused?

Then people would vote for the divider lol

Then make it so that it's a divider and the first seperate special interest like this:

- * red hair
- * hebes

[BanishedLetters]

Then people would vote for the divider lol

MMM DIVIDERS SO HOT~

[Electrk]

Then make it so that it's a divider and the first seperate special interest like this:

Then people would vote for the divider

[Wynd_Fox]

I think it would be like this "[poll option][hr]
[poll option]"

[Electrk]

I think it would be like this "[poll option][hr]
[poll option]"

Ah

[Axolotl2]

I think it would be like this "[poll option][hr]
[poll option]"

na

Code: [Select]

[poll option: hebes]
[poll option: [hr]red heads]

[Electrk]

na

Code: [Select]

[poll option: hebes]
[poll option: [hr]red heads]

Same thing pretty much

[TeslaCoil]

it doesn't really matter if people vote for the divider to be silly. The poll is set occasionally so they can always choose other options again.