Author Topic: Christianity  (Read 3962 times)


Talo's guide you.
This
Basically what this kid said, he kinda beat me to it.
Riddler still dispised the Jewish culture, so he raised the national socialist party.
Riddler wasn't doing it at all in the name of Christianity Regardless of him raising the national socialist party. He even persecuted the Christians combined with the Jews so there really is no room to argue with a straw man like that.

I think the bible is some pro early age trolling. They made that stuff as unbelievable as possible and then decided to see how many people would still believe it for teh lulz.

My complaint of the day about Christians : prayer before eating.
lol My family rarely does it anymore and I'm a Christian.

Imma come in and say that the Christians were one of the groups Riddler persecuted
Because many of the church members were hiding Jews.
Also in order to bring power to their own version of Christianity.
Not because of "WE HATE CHRISTIANS TOO" as you seen to be suggesting

My complaint of the day about Christians : prayer before eating.
They don't just do it, they make it a main event.
Anyone who doesn't share their beliefs pretty much has to do it anyways to avoid drawing attention or starting trouble.
I'm Christian and I don't get on people about not praying before their food. You don't have to loving do it if you don't want to so stop complaining about something you don't do.
Because many of the church members were hiding Jews.
Also in order to bring power to their own version of Christianty.
Hahaha. It's a conspiracy. No really that is the most loving handicapped thing I've ever heard. Riddler persecuted both parties because they both worshipped a god and not the national socialist flag.  

I think the bible is some pro early age trolling. They made that stuff as unbelievable as possible and then decided to see how many people would still believe it for teh lulz.
well it somewhat succeeded

Anyways, IMO, anyone who would willingly choose to dismiss an explanation for which their is an overwhelming amount of evidence for, and instead choose to believe the explanation whose only "evidence" is a centuries-old book that contains so many contradictions and inaccuracies, is either stupid or insane

and that would be?

There was just never enough proof for me. In the Scientific Field there's evidence, but with the Bible there wasn't any really. Besides, it was generally confusing and not pleasant at all. Hell, it said to Stone disobedient children to death.

Mmk there's no arguing with you.
>Completely wrong
>"okay there's no arguing with you"

>Completely wrong
>"okay there's no arguing with you"
So far nobody has been raising any valid points.



Can I have a larger version of that image so I can study it?

How do you have evidence against a theory?

I think the bible is some pro early age trolling. They made that stuff as unbelievable as possible and then decided to see how many people would still believe it for teh lulz.
-apostle-"and in this scene, jesus makes a bunch of fish appear out of forgetin' NOWHERE, man!"
-other apostle-"aw dude that's forgetin' hilarious man"