Author Topic: Religious thing this gay kid from my school posted  (Read 15724 times)

my bad i'm an improperly educated forgetass
nah

cartoons would have us believe evolving can happen by a single creature in its own lifetime.
but thats just fantasy. it wouldnt be fun if it was realistic, it takes to long and would be boring lol
« Last Edit: April 15, 2012, 04:04:38 PM by Bisjac »

how about frogs
they evolve from tadpoles, do they not?
That's called aging. Adult humans do not evolve from babies.

in theory
did 'einstein' just prove that god exists?
that he's some mental entity that's only bound together by the thin string of faith?
no this actually just proves that god is an idea, just like cold and heat are.

That's called aging. Adult humans do not evolve from babies.
WUT! U R LIER PEPUL EVOLV FRUM BBYS!!!!!!!



But yea its ageing.

but... but... I witnessed my charmander evolve into a charmeleon... :C

Post this whenever someone tries to proudly proclaim their faith on the internet:
http://bible.cc/matthew/6-1.htm

Because seriously, according to scriptures, God won't give two flat stuffs if you go around about it.  Like the popular brown townogy, you're no more of a Christian by sitting in a church than you are a car by sitting in a garage.

That person should not be a professor if he doesn't know that darkness and cold do not exist.

What's with religious people and writing random words in full caps?

Needless to say this wasn't an actual conversation anybody had and just something a Christian wrote to make it looks as pro religion as possible. I mean the kid basically said God exists solely based on faith and everyone else is stupid for believing the theory of evolution which is backed by tons of evidence just because it is not 100% conclusive. The flaw is he assumes if 2 things cannot be proven without 100% of a doubt than the chances of them being real are the same, when in reality just because you can't prove evolution and you can't prove there's monsters in your closet the chances of evolution being true are way more likely because it is backed by research and evidence.

by the way who was student

Seriously though this is so loving long.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_God_Delusion

Just thought this would fit in, I'm reading it right now!

by the way who was student

Seriously though this is so loving long.
Einstein

That person should not be a professor if he doesn't know that darkness and cold do not exist.
Darkness and cold do not exist by literal scientific definition.
But I know that darkness is a lack of light for my eyes to recieve and cold is a lack of heat on my skin and body.
It can't be an exact thing because people can have completely different interpretations of it. I can think a room is cold while another person finds it just right. It's a personal perception upon a stimuli.

Einstein didn't believe in a specific God.  He most certainly wasn't Catholic, I can say that much.

We have observable evidence that the professor has a brain. We have dissected bodies of people and found all of them to have brains. Though we have not physically observed or sensed it, we can infer it is there. On top of that, we have medical technology that can sense the brain.

What's with religious people and writing random words in full caps?
Those are just the stupid people who hate it when someone doesn't believe.
My aunts really religious and she just doesn't show pity for the Atheist rather than running around shouting "YOUR GOING TO HELL!!!"