Author Topic: Religious thing this gay kid from my school posted  (Read 16006 times)

No he doesn't, you're just very gullible and misinformed.

I didn't really mean it like that. :/

I find the fact that the person who wrote this said, "The student was Einstein."

This is 100% false, and is irrelevant.

What does heat and lack thereof have to do with God's existence, or lack thereof? o .o

Excellent read. The last thing the student said kinda killed it for me for some reason though.

To all those who deny it, prove, using the Professor's points and full and complete modern scientific theory that this kid is wrong.

Kid isn't Einstein.  Ok, prove it.

Observing "cold" is a condition and state of perception.  Prove that it isn't an absense of heat.

I can't see the floating space kings all around attempting to have brown town love with my face ass because they are invisible to my mortal eyes.
Exists.
No one has observed or believed this with having a good view of both sides.
you're just very gullible and misinformed.

Kid isn't Einstein.  Ok, prove it.
prove that it is

they stick it there to try and add validity

prove that it is

they stick it there to try and add validity
Prove that too.  We don't know if it is or not.  But the points that this student said, is by no doubt, very observant and well-backed by scientific methods.

Well, there was that video I posted that also said it was Einstein.

Well, there was that video I posted that also said it was Einstein.
I've seen this lecture 3 times in 3 different places.  They all claimed it was Einstein.

Prove that too.  We don't know if it is or not.  But the points that this student said, is by no doubt, very observant and well-backed by scientific methods.
The students points were not scientific.


Prove that too.  We don't know if it is or not.  But the points that this student said, is by no doubt, very observant and well-backed by scientific methods.
no legitimate source records this as being albert einstein. You'll find it on anti-athiest blogs only.

From the fact that there's no record of this being einstein, it's a safe assumption that they put it there to add validity.

(also backed by scientific methods? what? did you even read the conversation?)

If you cant prove that something is or isnt, its easier just to assume it isnt.

If you cant prove that something is or isnt, its easier just to assume it isnt.
I wouldn't say easier, i would say safer.

only a guillible person would assume it's Einstein when there's no evidence.

Prove that too.  We don't know if it is or not.  But the points that this student said, is by no doubt, very observant and well-backed by scientific methods.
Such as?

Prove that too.  We don't know if it is or not.  But the points that this student said, is by no doubt, very observant and well-backed by scientific methods.
You're an idiot.
To all those who deny it, prove, using the Professor's points and full and complete modern scientific theory that this kid is wrong.

Kid isn't Einstein.  Ok, prove it.

Observing "cold" is a condition and state of perception.  Prove that it isn't an absense of heat.
No one has observed or believed this with having a good view of both sides.
If I said I had a pet dinosaur in my backyard, people would need proof that it IS there, not having to find proof that it ISN'T there.

Nobody isn't saying cold isn't an absence of heat. We are saying cold is the absence of heat.