Author Topic: Why was Client_Grammar failed?  (Read 1711 times)


Poorly made most likely.

Poorly made most likely.
it was good. ephi needs o explain or badspot

it was good. ephi needs o explain or badspot
No, they don't.

http://forum.returntoblockland.com/dlm/viewFailBin.php

Automatic Grammar
Submitted: May 12th
Failed: May 13th
Reason: "Terrible."

So chances are it was not good.

It was well coded, but stupid.


Because it was a garbage add-on.

Because it was a failure to begin with.

Yeah, It could of been tweaked and made a bit smarter, but failing it was stupid.

Now we're stuck with 5 year olds talking like handicaps.

Now we're stuck with 5 year olds talking like handicaps.

implying it fixed that problem

Yeah, It could of been tweaked and made a bit smarter, but failing it was stupid.

Now we're stuck with 5 year olds talking like handicaps.

It didn't fix any problems, you dolt.

In fact, it made more problems.

Quote from: Ephialtes
This is basically the worst thing anyone's ever made for Blockland. I've moved the thread some idiot posted in Add-Ons containing this crap.


It was well coded, but stupid.
It was poorly coded and stupid.
Quote
         case "dont":
            %word[%i] = "don't";
         case "i":
            %word[%i] = "I";
         case "ive":
            %word[%i] = "I've";
         case "whatchya":
            %word[%i] = "what do you";
         case "wat":
            %word[%i] = "what";
         case "whats":
            %word[%i] = "what's";
         case "isnt":
            %word[%i] = "isn't";
         case "im":
            %word[%i] = "I'm";
         case "its":
            %word[%i] = "it's";
         case "wasnt":
            %word[%i] = "wasn't";
         case "couldnt":
            %word[%i] = "couldn't";
         case "wouldve":
            %word[%i] = "would've";
         case "kik":
            %word[%i] = "lol";
         case "id":
            %word[%i] = "I'd";
         case "ill":
            %word[%i] = "I'll";
         case "stil":
            %word[%i] = "still";
         case "probaly":
            %word[%i] = "probably";
         case "probs":
            %word[%i] = "probably";
         case "intersting":
            %word[%i] = "intresting";
         case "bord":
            %word[%i] = "bored";
         case "se":
            %word[%i] = "see";
         case "catually":
            %word[%i] = "actually";
         case "actualy":
            %word[%i] = "actually";
         case "lest":
            %word[%i] = "lets";
         case "somthig":
            %word[%i] = "something";
         case "poeple":
            %word[%i] = "people";
         case "H,,":
            %word[%i] = "Hmm";
         case "vant":
            %word[%i] = "can't";
         case "wont":
            %word[%i] = "won't";
         case "nothig":
            %word[%i] = "nothing";
         case "siht":
            %word[%i] = "stuff";
         case "letme":
            %word[%i] = "let me";
         case "tht":
            %word[%i] = "that";
         case "thta":
            %word[%i] = "that";
         case "blokc":
            %word[%i] = "block";
         case "cant":
            %word[%i] = "can't";
         case "sylvandor":
            %word[%i] = "sylvanor";
         case "hsot":
            %word[%i] = "host";
This is not an ideal way to do word replacement.

He even admitted it:
Quote
Well while it does teach some horrid coding habits[...]