Lord Tony is back

[Lørd Tøny²]

doublepost and no. i read the rule, it says Do not post adult content.

So you're looking for loopholes. Well by that logic there is no rule saying you can't have naked furry research as your avatar.

[Ad Bot]

[Nobot]

doublepost and no. i read the rule, it says Do not post adult content.

Or gross stuff.

Also, you don't get banned. You simply get your signature editing privileges taken from you.
Although, if Badspot wants to, he can ban you for it. It's a rule.

Whether you post it on a topic or post it on your signature.
You shouldn't have it regardless where it's located.

[Soukuw]

doublepost and no. i read the rule, it says Do not post adult content.

Yes because Badspot does a little jig and tips his hat to anyone who finds a [SARCASM]clever[/SARCASM] loop hole.

[LawtyLawt]

DRAMA:
You're not the target, and yet you get more hunted than the target.

[Soukuw]

So you're looking for loopholes. Well by that logic there is no rule saying you can't have naked furry research as your avatar.

It's odd as forget how to say "Naked furry research" of course they are naked, it's research.

[Ceist]

So you're looking for loopholes. Well by that logic there is no rule saying you can't have naked furry research as your avatar.

it's not directly affecting anyone, you can click on if you want. you're only complaining because you want a reason to argue.

[Nobot]

it's not directly affecting anyone, you can click on if you want. you're only complaining because you want a reason to argue.

Technically traplinking to furry research.
You posted it on your profile, still breaking the rules.

[Aces]

Yes very effective complain about someone's signature you probably would only click on because someone said there was furry research there, lol.

[Lørd Tøny²]

it's not directly affecting anyone, you can click on if you want. you're only complaining because you want a reason to argue.

Probably because no one looks at your profile but when they do, they complain on the spot.

[Ceist]

Yes very effective complain about someone's signature you probably would only click on because someone said there was furry research there, lol.

i lol'd.

Probably because no one looks at your profile but when they do, they complain on the spot.

but why complain about it. it's pointless, you can click it or not.

[Aces]

Probably because no one looks at your profile but when they do, they complain on the spot.

Yes like people had an option not to look at the Hot Anime Girls thread you stuffted on.

[Soukuw]

it's not directly affecting anyone, you can click on if you want. you're only complaining because you want a reason to argue.

Yeah and my post wasn't directly effecting people ether, only had tits showing and also wasn't embedded.

At least I didn't post an entire website.

[Nobot]

i lol'd.but why complain about it. it's pointless, you can click it or not.

So if you have a button leading to a naked woman loving a dog and you said "You don't have to click it" it's fine?
Still technically traplinking, people have been banned for traplinking in their signature before.
Yes, banned.

[Port]

besides, none of the links actually lead to a page containing research
that page has links to research though
and the page clearly defines what it is

so it isn't traplinking

[Ceist]

So if you have a button leading to a naked woman loving a dog and you said "You don't have to click it" it's fine?
Still technically traplinking, people have been banned for traplinking in their signature before.
Yes, banned.

it's not traplinking because it's not a false link and you know exactly where it goes.