Listen up, Atheists.

[RedGajin]

you're trying to force the other side to conform to something.

What? Asking someone to "please stop talking to me about your religion" is not the same "shut the forget up and realize god is stupid". Not the same thing at all.

[Ad Bot]

[Aces]

Cyber, the problem is bias we're raised with.
When we grow up, we expand a little in our independent thinking.

And then people go on the internet, read atheism propoganda and logic. become atheists. Rise n Repeat.

[_Rave_]

propoganda

it's funny, i never imagined anyone would refer to science as "propaganda."  pathetic, really.

[Cybersix]

And then people go on the internet, read atheism propoganda and logic. become atheists. Rise n Repeat.

What I have a problem about "internet atheists" is they usually never take a long time to contemplate about this very serious spiritual issue.

[Moppy]

You see everyone?
It's not possible to say anything in a religeon war without someone taking something the wrong way and getting back at it.
Few benefits.
Nobody really wins.

[Aces]

it's funny, i never imagined anyone would refer to science as "propaganda."  pathetic, really.

>implying every argument is about scientific reasoning over logical reasoning.

Pathetic, indeed.

[Katamari007]

You see everyone?
It's not possible to say anything in a religeon war without someone taking something the wrong way and getting back at it.
Few benefits.
Nobody really wins.

It's called a debate.

[_Rave_]

>implying every argument is about scientific reasoning over logical reasoning.

Pathetic, indeed.

see, science and logic tend to go hand in hand.  however, a floating man in the sky (see god), super incest loving (see adam and eve), and millions of animals on a wooden boat (see noah's ark) don't really radiate logic.

[Narkro555]

And then people go on the internet, read atheism propoganda and logic. become atheists. Rise n Repeat.

:v

You know, starting a topic deliberately mocking religion is definitely going to start a religion war. Debate is healthy, but at times it gets annoying to have this much.

[Katamari007]

super incest loving (see adam and eve)

Ehh. They were supposedly the only two humans alive in the world at the time, just saying.

But in general, yeah there's a lot of incest in the Bible.

[_Rave_]

Ehh. They were supposedly the only two humans alive in the world at the time, just saying.

But in general, yeah there's a lot of incest in the Bible.

yes, and by that logic the human race is the product of mommy-son, daddy-daughter, and sibling loving.

[Cybersix]

Ehh. They were supposedly the only two humans alive in the world at the time, just saying.

But in general, yeah there's a lot of incest in the Bible.

Well we all share a common ancestor.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_Eve

[Aces]

see, science and logic tend to go hand in hand.  however, a floating man in the sky (see god), super incest loving (see adam and eve), and millions of animals on a wooden boat (see noah's ark) don't really radiate logic.

But I wasn't talking about science, dear.

There are other reasons for arguing over than protecting your ability to recite scientific information.

:v

You know, starting a topic deliberately mocking religion is definitely going to start a religion war. Debate is healthy, but at times it gets annoying to have this much.

I thought you despised religion though.

[Tango]

op is handicapped and science is right

[Katamari007]

Well we all share a common ancestor.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_Eve

Exactly exactly


On another note, I want to add that even though I see the Bible as mostly fictitious, it's pretty badass. Considering some of the things that are in it

I thought you despised religion though.

That's a stupid reason to start a stuffstorm. So what if you disagree with someone's beliefs? You should at least be civil about it.